Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Observational Ages 18 to 80

Erector spinae plane block versus transcutaneous radiofrequency for postherpetic neuralgia

Official title: Which Is More Effective in the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia: Erector Spinae Plane Block or Transcutaneous Radiofrequency?

Run by Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital · NCT07400640 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This project will see if erector spinae plane block or transcutaneous radiofrequency works better to reduce pain in adults with postherpetic neuralgia.

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Ages18 Years to 80 Years
SexAll
Enrollment50 (estimated)
SponsorDiskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Ankara)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJune 1, 2025
Main results expectedJune 1, 2026
Study endsOctober 1, 2026
Registry record updatedFebruary 25, 2026
Trial IDNCT07400640 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults aged 18–80 with postherpetic neuralgia in the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar regions who had persistent pain despite conservative treatment and a baseline VAS score greater than 5 are the ideal candidates represented in this analysis.

Probably not a fit

Patients with ophthalmic or extremity postherpetic neuralgia, those who were pregnant, had coagulopathy or antiplatelet therapy, allergy to local anesthetics, or cognitive impairment preventing consent would not be represented and may not benefit from these results.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This is a retrospective observational comparison of two commonly used treatments for postherpetic neuralgia performed at a single algology clinic. Patients who previously received either ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block or transcutaneous radiofrequency (RF) as part of routine care are grouped by the treatment they received. Pain intensity and neuropathic pain features will be compared using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and S-LANSS scores recorded before treatment, immediately after treatment, and at one-month follow-up. No randomization or changes to clinical care were made for the purposes of this analysis.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the findings could help clinicians choose the treatment more likely to give better short-term pain relief and reduce neuropathic symptoms for patients with postherpetic neuralgia.

How similar studies have gone: Previous case series and small trials report pain relief with both ESP block and transcutaneous RF for neuropathic pain, but direct head-to-head comparative data are limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

Diagnosis of postherpetic neuralgia involving cervical, thoracic, or lumbar regions

Age between 18 and 80 years

Persistent pain despite conservative treatment

Baseline VAS score \> 5

Exclusion Criteria:

Ophthalmic or extremity postherpetic neuralgia

Allergy to local anesthetics

Pregnancy

Coagulopathy or use of antiplatelet therapy

Cognitive impairment preventing informed consent

Where it's running

  • Ayse Betul Acar
    Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.