Electronic bidets after anal surgery vs water rinsing
Official title: The Use of Electronic Bidets Compared to Water Rinsing After Surgery for Anal Fistula or Hemorrhoidal Disease: a Pilot Study
Run by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · NCT07874711 · Data updated 2026-11-12
A small study tests whether using an electronic bidet after anal fistula or hemorrhoid surgery helps patients more than standard water rinsing.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Brussels) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 2028 |
| Study ends | December 2028 |
| Registry record updated | October 15, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07874711 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18 years and older who had fistulotomy or sphincter-sparing AF surgery or hemorrhoidectomy, capable of Dutch or French communication, and with a suitable electrical outlet nearby.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who previously used bidets or have conditions contraindicating warm water exposure may not experience benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This pilot study compares two postoperative cleansing methods after anal fistula or hemorrhoidal surgery: electronic bidets versus standard water rinsing with a showerhead. Participants are adults who have undergone fistulotomy, sphincter-sparing AF surgery, or hemorrhoidectomy, and meet language and safety criteria. The goal is to observe postoperative pain, discomfort, wound infection, and overall satisfaction, to determine if bidets offer any advantage over traditional rinsing. The study uses a randomized or parallel design with a control group receiving water rinsing; larger studies may be considered if results are favorable. Results could inform future guidelines on postoperative care for proctological procedures.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience less pain and higher satisfaction with wound care after proctological surgery.
How similar studies have gone: Some prior postoperative studies in hemorrhoid surgery suggest higher satisfaction with bidets, but data are limited and this area remains exploratory.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients will undergo fistulotomy or sphincter-sparing surgery for AF or haemorrhoidec-tomy for HD * 18 years or older * Able to speak and read Dutch or French * Patients must have a power outlet within 3m of their toilet or they need to be able to use an extension cable Exclusion Criteria: * Systemic diseases with perianal impact * Altered perianal sensation (to prevent burns because of the warm water) * Inflammatory bowel disease * Chronic dermatological conditions * AIDS * Hepatitis C * Patients under immunosuppression after a solid organ or stem cell transplantation * Heart failure * Kidney failure with eGFR under 60ml/min * Current malignancy * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * The use of a bidet at home before the start of the study
Where it's running
-
UZ Brussel
Brussels, Belgium Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Magali Surmont, MD
- Email: magali.surmont@uzbrussel.be
- Phone: +3224776011
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Recurrence and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Anal Fistula Surgery
This observational project will see if different surgical treatments for perianal fistulas lead to better healing, continence, and quality of life for adults having definitive fistula surgery.
-
Minimally Invasive Closed Hemorrhoidectomy for Grade III Hemorrhoids
This study tests a minimally invasive, closed hemorrhoidectomy approach for adults with Grade III hemorrhoids to see if it offers good outcomes with less pain and quicker healing.
-
Minimally invasive hemorrhoidectomy for grade III/IV hemorrhoids
This study tests a minimally invasive hemorrhoidectomy technique in adults with grade III or IV hemorrhoids to see if it provides relief with less pain than traditional methods.
-
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty outcomes in internal hemorrhoids
This study tests how patients with symptomatic internal hemorrhoids fare after laser hemorrhoidoplasty, focusing on pain, complications, and satisfaction after the procedure.
-
Comparing IFOC and LIFT surgery for high anal fistula.
This will test whether IFOC or LIFT surgery leads to better healing and continence for people with high anal fistula.
-
Long-acting liposomal bupivacaine for pain after hemorrhoid surgery
This test tries whether injecting long-acting liposomal bupivacaine around the surgical site reduces postoperative pain for adults having elective hemorrhoid surgery.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.