Comparing GPR versus NASM corrective exercises for upper-cross posture and neck pain
Official title: Comparative Effects of Global Postural Re-education and NASM-based Corrective Exercises in Patients With Upper Cross Syndrome (UCS)
Run by Superior University · NCT07528248 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This tests whether Global Postural Re-education or NASM-based corrective exercises better reduce pain and disability and improve neck endurance and posture in adults aged 20–45 with upper cross syndrome.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 45 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 46 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Superior University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Okāra, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 5, 2026 |
| Main results expected | May 10, 2026 |
| Study ends | May 10, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | April 14, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07528248 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 20–45 with neck and upper back pain, rounded shoulders, a craniovertebral angle under 47°, and willingness/ability to attend supervised sessions three times per week are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
People with prior spinal surgery, neurological deficits, severe scoliosis, or active cervical spine disease are excluded and would not be expected to benefit from these protocols within this trial.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults with upper cross syndrome (craniovertebral angle <47°) will be assigned to receive either Global Postural Re-education (GPR) or NASM-based corrective exercises three times per week for eight weeks. Pain, disability, muscle endurance, and craniovertebral angle will be measured at baseline, at four weeks, and at the end of the eight-week program. Each intervention consists of therapist-led, posture-focused exercise sessions designed to correct muscle imbalances and improve alignment. The trial compares the two active exercise programs to see if one produces greater improvements in symptoms and posture.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the results could guide clinicians toward the more effective exercise program to reduce pain and improve posture and neck endurance for people with upper cross syndrome.
How similar studies have gone: Previous physiotherapy research indicates posture-focused and corrective-exercise programs can reduce neck/shoulder pain and improve posture, but direct head-to-head comparisons of GPR versus NASM approaches are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age between 20-45 years 2. Pain in the upper back and neck region. 3. Both male and female patients 4. Rounded shoulders 5. Craniovertebral angle less than 47 degrees 6. Willingness to participate Exclusion Criteria: 1. History of spinal surgery 2. Neurological deficits (radiculopathy, myelopathy, disc herniation) 3. Severe scoliosis or structural deformity 4. Active cervical spine pathology (spondylosis, stenosis and fracture)
Where it's running
-
District Headquarter Hospital (DHQ) Okara
Okāra, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Kendall exercises with and without positional release therapy for upper crossed syndrome
This study tests Kendall exercises with and without positional release therapy to see if they reduce neck and shoulder pain and improve posture in adults with upper crossed syndrome.
-
Breathing and manual therapy to improve function in college students with upper cross syndrome
In college students with upper cross syndrome, adding a specific breathing technique (ujjayi pranayama) to manual therapy is being tested to see if it helps spinal alignment relate to better functional performance.
-
Kendall vs Janda’s Approach with Diaphragmatic Breathing for Upper Crossed Syndrome
This trial tests whether Kendall exercises with diaphragmatic breathing help reduce pain and disability in people with Upper Crossed Syndrome compared with Janda’s approach plus diaphragmatic breathing.
-
Egoscue vs Feldenkrais for Upper Cross Syndrome
This trial compares two exercise approaches, Egoscue and Feldenkrais, to see if one can reduce neck and shoulder pain and improve posture in adults with upper cross syndrome.
-
Maitland mobilization plus Kendall exercises vs Kendall exercises alone for upper cross syndrome
This trial tests whether adding Maitland mobilization to Kendall exercises helps reduce neck/upper back pain and improve posture in adults with Upper Cross Syndrome.
-
Rib mobilization with postural correction exercises for Upper Crossed Syndrome
This will test whether adding rib mobilization to postural correction exercises helps people aged 20–45 with Upper Crossed Syndrome reduce neck pain and improve posture and thoracic mobility.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.