Effect of EMG sensor number and placement on control of below-elbow prosthetic arms
Official title: Evaluation of Functional Performance of Persons With Limb Differences to Optimize Pattern Recognition Control of Powered Upper Limb Prosthesis
Run by Liberating Technologies, Inc. · NCT07011420 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This project will test whether changing the number and placement of myoelectric sensors helps adults with below-elbow limb absence control a prosthetic arm better while wearing a real device.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 32 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Liberating Technologies, Inc. Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 2 sites (Chicago, Illinois and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 2025 |
| Main results expected | June 2026 |
| Study ends | June 2026 |
| Registry record updated | September 3, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07011420 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (18+) with unilateral transradial limb absence who are current or former myoelectric prosthesis users, at least six months post-amputation, with a well-fitting socket and ability to operate a wrist rotator and multi-articulating hand are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
People with bilateral or more proximal amputations, those unable to wear a wrist rotator or a comfortable socket, those less than six months post-amputation, or those with cognitive impairment preventing task participation are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized crossover study compares different myoelectric sensor configurations — including 4, 8, and up to 16 untargeted channels and an 8-channel targeted configuration — while participants wear a functional prosthetic arm. Adults with unilateral transradial limb absence who are current or past users of myoelectric prostheses will perform standardized functional tests such as the AMULA, ACMC, Box and Blocks, and Clothespin relocation while using each configuration. The study uses physical prosthetic sockets and a commercial EMG cuff to capture real-world performance rather than relying on offline data from able-bodied subjects. Outcomes will quantify whether channel count or targeted placement improves everyday task performance.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the findings could guide clinicians and device makers to choose sensor counts and placements that improve everyday control and function for below-elbow prosthesis users.
How similar studies have gone: Most prior research was performed offline with able-bodied subjects and produced mixed or uncertain results, so testing these assumptions with actual prosthesis users is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Unilateral transradial level limb absence * Current or past user of myo-electric controlled prostheses * Six months or more post-amputation * Have adequate limb length such that a wrist rotation device can fit in the check socket * Well-fitting socket as determined by a Socket-Comfort Score of 6 or above * Capable of wearing and operating a prosthesis with a wrist rotator and multi-articulating hand * Capable of understanding and following multi-step instructions and completing the tasks as described * English speaking Exclusion Criteria: * Significant new injury that would prevent use of a prosthesis: The ability to consistently wear a prosthesis and perform activities of daily living and specific performance tasks is necessary to evaluate the relative benefits of the interventions. * Cognitive impairment sufficient to adversely affect understanding of or compliance with study requirements, ability to communicate experiences, or ability to give informed consent: The ability to understand and comply with requirements of the study is essential for the study to generate useable, reliable data. The ability to obtain relevant user feedback through questionnaires and informal discussion adds significant value to this study.
Where it's running
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Chicago, Illinois, United States Recruiting -
Liberating Technologies, Inc.
Holliston, Massachusetts, United States Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Todd Farrell, PhD — Liberating Technologies, Inc.
- Study coordinator: Brianna Rozell
- Email: brianna.rozell@liberatingtech.com
- Phone: 774-233-0876
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing powered and mechanical prosthetic knees for K2-level amputees
This study is testing whether powered prosthetic knees work better than mechanical ones for K2-level amputees to help improve their mobility and make better choices for future prosthetic designs.
-
Microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees for limited community ambulators with above-knee amputation.
This test will see if switching to a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee reduces fall-related health problems and improves walking speed, mobility, and quality of life for adults with above-knee amputations who are limited community ambulators compared with non-microprocessor knees.
-
Understanding the impact of powered prosthetics on walking for transfemoral amputees
This study is testing whether powered knee and ankle prosthetics can help transfemoral amputees walk better, especially when combined with special training.
-
Understanding the experiences of upper limb prosthesis users
This study is trying to understand how people who use upper limb prostheses feel about them and what affects their acceptance, to help match them with the right devices and improve their quality of life.
-
Optimize how you control a powered upper-limb prosthesis
This study tests new electrode configurations to improve myoelectric control for people with a below-elbow amputation using a prosthetic arm.
-
Surgery or semi-occlusive dressing for a single finger amputation
This study will test whether a semi-occlusive film dressing or surgery gives better hand function for adults who have lost the tip of a single finger.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.