Early versus delayed shock wave treatment for leftover kidney stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Official title: Optimum Time for Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Residual Stones After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Comparative Randomized Study
Run by Beni-Suef University · NCT07523074 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether doing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) early or waiting longer after PCNL helps clear leftover kidney stone fragments ≤15 mm with fewer complications.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 476 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Beni-Suef University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Banī Suwayf, Beni-Suef Governrate) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 2, 2025 |
| Main results expected | October 2026 |
| Study ends | December 2026 |
| Registry record updated | April 13, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07523074 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–70 with single or multiple residual renal stone fragments ≤15 mm after PCNL, normal renal function, and no active urinary tract infection are the intended participants.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with stones >15 mm, obstructed drainage, active sepsis or UTI, bleeding disorders, or on anticoagulant therapy are excluded and unlikely to benefit from the specific findings of this comparison.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective, randomized comparison of two timings for ESWL after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with residual renal stones 15 mm or smaller. Eligible adults are randomized to receive ESWL early after PCNL or after a delayed interval, and are followed for stone clearance and procedure-related complications. Key outcomes include stone-free rate, need for additional interventions, and rates of bleeding or infection. The work is conducted at a single center (Beni‑Suef University Hospital) with standard ESWL protocols and predefined safety monitoring.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, identifying the best timing could increase stone-free rates and reduce repeat procedures or complications for patients with residual fragments after PCNL.
How similar studies have gone: Observational and retrospective reports suggest early ESWL can improve clearance of residual fragments, but randomized evidence is limited and definitive results are lacking.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18-70 years. * Single or multiple residual renal stones ≤15 mm after PCNL. * Normal renal function (serum creatinine \<1.5 mg/dL). * No active UTI. Exclusion Criteria: * Bleeding disorders or anticoagulant therapy. * Obstructed drainage or active sepsis. * Stones \>15 mm or requiring secondary PCNL.
Where it's running
-
Beni-Suef university hospital
Banī Suwayf, Beni-Suef Governrate, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Mahmoud Abdallah Mahmoud, lecturer of urology
- Email: mahmoud.abdalla@med.bsu.edu.eg
- Phone: +2001155361979
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Suction vs Conventional Ureteral Access Sheaths in Kidney Stone Surgery
This study tests whether using a suction ureteral access sheath during RIRS helps adults clear stones more often and potentially reduces operative time and infections compared with a conventional sheath.
-
Observation vs Upfront Surgery for Asymptomatic Kidney Stones in Children and Adults
This trial tests whether watching asymptomatic kidney stones or performing upfront surgery is better for reducing life disruption in patients aged 6 and older.
-
Tract Closure with Hemostatic Agent in PCNL
This trial tests whether applying a hemostatic agent during tract closure in PCNL helps reduce blood loss compared with balloon tamponade alone.
-
Suction to collapse the kidney's collecting system after RIRS (retrograde intrarenal surgery)
This trial will test whether actively suctioning the kidney's collecting system at the end of RIRS reduces early postoperative pain and infections for adults having kidney stone removal.
-
Compare two suction ureteroscope devices for kidney stones (FANS vs CVAC)
This study tests whether two new suction-enabled ureteroscopes (FANS and CVAC) lead to better stone clearance for adults with small to medium kidney stones compared to each other.
-
21-day comprehensive spa care for kidney and urinary conditions
This program will try a 21-day spa treatment with mineral water baths, drinking cures, exercise and diet for adults 40–70 who have chronic kidney or urinary problems to see if it improves symptoms and kidney health.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.