Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Observational Ages 18 and up

Doctors' and patients' preferences for PCI implantation devices

Official title: Study on the Preferences for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Implantation Devices Among Healthcare Providers and Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Run by Xijing Hospital · NCT07378163 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This questionnaire tests what patients who have had PCI and the doctors who treat them prefer between drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons.

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment600 (estimated)
SponsorXijing Hospital
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Xi'an, Shannxi)
StatusRecruiting
StartedAugust 18, 2025
Main results expectedMarch 1, 2026
Study endsMarch 1, 2026
Registry record updatedJanuary 30, 2026
Trial IDNCT07378163 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal participants are adults who have acute or chronic coronary syndrome and have undergone PCI and can complete the questionnaire, as well as healthcare providers who treat coronary artery disease.

Probably not a fit

People under 18, those unable to understand the questionnaire or with cognitive impairment, and individuals who have not undergone PCI are unlikely to benefit from participation.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

Contemporary PCI typically uses balloon lesion preparation followed by a drug-eluting stent (DES) to scaffold the vessel and reduce restenosis, while drug-coated balloons (DCB) deliver antiproliferative drug without leaving a metallic scaffold. DCBs are established for in-stent restenosis and small vessels, but the REC-CAGEFREE I trial found a DCB-first strategy with rescue stenting did not meet non-inferiority versus planned DES in de novo, non-complex coronary disease. This observational study uses questionnaires administered at Xijing Hospital to capture preferences from patients who have undergone PCI and from healthcare providers who treat coronary artery disease. The goal is to map attitudes toward device choice to inform shared decision-making and future device-use strategies.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the results could help align device selection with patient values and inform clinician decision-making to potentially reduce unnecessary stent use.

How similar studies have gone: Prior trials show DCBs are effective for in-stent restenosis and small vessels, but REC-CAGEFREE I reported a DCB-with-rescue-stent strategy did not demonstrate non-inferiority compared with intended DES for de novo non-complex CAD.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with acute or chronic coronary syndrome who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention;
2. Patients who can understand the purpose of this trial and are willing to participate in the preference questionnaire.
3. Healthcare providers who treat patients with coronary artery disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Aged \< 18 years;
2. Inability to understand the questionnaire or presence of cognitive impairment.

Where it's running

  • Xijing Hospital
    Xi'an, Shannxi, China
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.