Do repeated hyperbaric oxygen sessions increase DNA damage after radiotherapy?
Official title: Assessment of the Impact of Increased Production of Reactive Oxygen Species Produced During Repeated Sessions of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Neoplasia, on the Occurrence of DNA Damage
Run by University Hospital, Angers · NCT06999785 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This tests whether repeated hyperbaric oxygen therapy sessions cause more DNA damage in adults who are receiving HBOT after prior radiotherapy or for related complications.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University Hospital, Angers Government |
| Drugs / interventions | Radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Angers) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 8, 2025 |
| Main results expected | September 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | November 15, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | April 6, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06999785 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults (18+) admitted to the hyperbaric medicine department for HBOT, including those being treated for radiotherapy-related complications and able to give informed consent and use national health insurance.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who are not receiving HBOT, who are pregnant or breastfeeding, legally incapacitated, or deprived of liberty, and those not exposed to prior radiotherapy-related complications are unlikely to gain useful information from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This interventional protocol enrolls adults undergoing hyperbaric oxygen therapy, primarily those treated for complications of prior radiotherapy, and collects blood samples to measure reactive oxygen species and markers of DNA damage. Blood tests are timed around repeated HBOT sessions to characterize short-term increases in ROS and any cumulative changes over multiple exposures. The study compares biomarker levels before and after sessions and over the course of the treatment schedule to see if genotoxic signals are attenuated or amplified with repetition. Results aim to clarify the biological safety profile of repeated HBOT exposures in patients with a history of radiotherapy.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this could clarify whether repeated HBOT is safe after radiotherapy and guide monitoring or scheduling to reduce long-term mutagenic risk.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work shows a single HBOT session raises ROS and can cause transient DNA damage, but evidence on the effects of repeated sessions is mixed and not conclusive.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults (≥18 years old) * Having signed an informed consent form * Affiliated with or beneficiary of a national health insurance system * Admitted to the hyperbaric medicine department for HBOT treatment * Either for a complication related to prior radiotherapy (administered for an underlying neoplastic disease), such as: Radiation cystitis Radiation proctitis / enteritis Radiation dermatitis Mandibular osteoradionecrosis Or for another indication, without any underlying neoplastic disease Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with a contraindication to hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) * Pregnant, breastfeeding, or postpartum women * Patients deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision * Patients undergoing involuntary psychiatric treatment * Patients under legal guardianship or protective custody
Where it's running
-
CHU Angers
Angers, France Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Marie Lemerle, Doctor
- Email: marie.lemerle@chu-angers.fr
- Phone: 0241343118
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Sedation Methods in PTBD: How Two Regimens Compare for Quality and Recovery
This study tests two sedation plans (propofol with remifentanil vs propofol with ketamine) to see which helps patients recover faster after PTBD while staying comfortable and safe.
-
Chest wall reconstruction using twisted stainless steel wires versus PMMA bone cement
This project will test whether twisted stainless steel wires or PMMA bone cement gives better outcomes for adults needing chest wall reconstruction after tumor- or infection-related resections.
-
Capmatinib treatment for adults with cancers having MET gene changes
This study is testing if capmatinib, a drug for lung cancer, can help adults with different types of cancers that have changes in the MET gene.
-
Informatics-assisted detection of immune-related side effects to improve biorepository enrollment
This project tests whether an automated system that reads electronic health records can help identify cancer patients on immunotherapy who are having immune-related side effects so they can be enrolled in a biorepository.
-
Imaging method for digestive system cancer using targeted PET scans
This study is testing a new type of PET scan to see if it can better help doctors find and diagnose cancers in the digestive system.
-
Two thin Percuflex polyurethane stents versus one larger 8Fr silicone stent for malignant ureteral obstruction
The trial will try placing two 6Fr Percuflex polyurethane stents side-by-side versus a single large 8Fr silicone stent in people with malignant ureteral obstruction to see which approach fails less often and how they affect comfort, quality of life, and survival.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.