Digital versus traditional ankle-foot orthoses for people with lower limb weakness
Official title: Feasibility RCT Evaluating Digitally and Traditionally Produced Ankle Foot Orthoses for Individuals With Impaired Lower Limb Function
Run by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital · NCT06828653 · Data updated 2026-11-12
We will try if ankle-foot braces made with 3D scanning and printing work as well as traditional plaster-cast braces for people with leg weakness or stiffness from conditions like stroke or cerebral palsy.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 8 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 50 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Mississauga, Ontario and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 5, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 2026 |
| Study ends | March 31, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | November 20, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06828653 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are ambulatory people aged 8 or older with flaccid or spastic lower-limb paresis (e.g., from cerebral palsy, stroke, spinal cord injury or peripheral nerve injury) who need a custom articulating, rigid, or ESR AFO and meet Ontario Assistive Devices Program funding criteria.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients whose primary AFO need is for wound management, those with insensate feet or prior foot ulcers, non-ambulatory individuals, or first-time AFO users are unlikely to benefit from the comparisons in this trial.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This feasibility trial compares AFOs produced by traditional plaster-cast methods with AFOs produced using digital workflows (3D scanning and digital fabrication) in people with flaccid or spastic paresis. Participants aged 8 and older who already ambulate and require a custom AFO will wear both types during defined wear periods to compare fit, function, and satisfaction. The study collects clinical measures of walking/function, patient-reported satisfaction, and the time and costs associated with each production method. Results will inform a larger randomized trial and determine whether digital production can offer similar outcomes with greater efficiency.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, digital production could deliver AFOs faster and at lower cost while providing the same functional benefit as traditional devices.
How similar studies have gone: Small pilot studies and clinical reports suggest 3D-scanned and digitally fabricated AFOs can match traditional devices for fit and function, but high-quality comparative trials remain limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Participants must be aged 8 years or older. * Participants should have either flaccid or spastic paresis resulting from conditions such as cerebral palsy, stroke, spinal cord injury, spina bifida, or traumatic peripheral nerve injury, leading to lower limb mobility impairments. * Participants must require a custom articulating, rigid, or energy storage and return (ESR) AFO to improve physical function for one or both sides (unilateral or bilateral). * Participants must be able to ambulate independently, though the use of gait aids is permitted. * Participants must be capable of completing questionnaires with no more than orienting guidance. * Participants must meet the requirements to have their AFO funded by the Assistive Devices Program (ADP). Exclusion Criteria: * Clients for whom the primary goal of the AFO includes wound management. * Those whose AFO is not worn for ambulation. * Clients with insensate feet or a history of ulcerations. * First-time AFO users.
Where it's running
-
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada Recruiting -
Boundless Biomechanical Bracing
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Jan Andrysek, P.Eng, PhD — Bloorview Research Institute
- Study coordinator: Calvin Ngan, PhD
- Email: cngan@hollandbloorview.ca
- Phone: 416-425-6220
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Gait and Achilles Tendon Properties in Spastic Paresis
This study tests how the Achilles tendon and calf muscle function during walking in people with spastic weakness after stroke or spinal cord injury, compared with healthy individuals.
-
Targeting the plantaris tendon during surgery to correct ankle equinus in children
This trial tests whether cutting the small plantaris tendon, together with standard calf-lengthening surgery, helps children aged 4–17 with ankle equinus walk and use their feet better.
-
How VR Can Make a Virtual Body Feel Real
This study tests different immersive virtual reality techniques to see which best makes a person feel the virtual body as their own, including in people with spinal cord injury or stroke.
-
Spatial StimelMD for upper-limb recovery after stroke or traumatic brain injury
This trial will test whether adding the Spatial StimelMD device to standard rehabilitation helps adults with upper-limb weakness after stroke or traumatic brain injury improve arm movement.
-
Combining non-invasive brain and spinal cord stimulation to improve arm and hand function
This study tests whether pairing non-invasive brain stimulation (tDCS) with spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) during a cognitive-motor task can improve sensorimotor and cognitive-motor function in people with cervical spinal cord injury or stroke compared with each stimulation alone or sham.
-
Neuro20 electrical stimulation suit to improve autonomic control, muscle performance, and walking after amputation or neurologic injury
This will test whether wearing the Neuro20 electrical stimulation suit helps people at least one week after an amputation or neurologic injury (stroke, spinal cord injury, or brain injury) improve autonomic function, muscle strength, and walking.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.