Cosmetic serum versus 4% hydroquinone for treating facial melasma over 84 days
Official title: COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE DERMATOLOGICAL TOLERANCE AND EFFICACY OF A COSMETIC SERUM VERSUS A 4% HYDROQUINONE-BASED PRODUCT IN SUBJECTS WITH MELASMA, AFTER 84 DAYS OF USE - STUDY CONDUCTED UNDER DERMATOLOGICAL SUPERVISION
Run by Laboratoire Dermatologique ACM · NCT07071363 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether a cosmetic depigmenting serum lightens mild-to-moderate facial melasma and is gentler on the skin than a 4% hydroquinone cream in adults 18–65.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Laboratoire Dermatologique ACM Industry-sponsored |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Port Louis, Phoenix) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 23, 2025 |
| Main results expected | October 31, 2025 |
| Study ends | December 22, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | August 20, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07071363 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18–65 with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes II–V and mild-to-moderate epidermal or mixed facial melasma (mMASI 3.5–13) who can use SPF50+ sunscreen and attend scheduled visits.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with non-melasma facial pigmentation (post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, lentigines), current use of topical or systemic depigmenting treatments, or who cannot attend the Mauritius site are unlikely to benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This double-blind, randomized, controlled trial compares an intensive anti-spot cosmetic serum (Depiwhite Serum) plus SPF50+ sunscreen with a 4% hydroquinone cream (Eldopinone) plus the same sunscreen over 84 days in adults with epidermal or mixed melasma. Participants are randomized to morning and evening regimens combining the serum or placebo and a high-protection sunscreen, with outcomes measured at baseline and day 84. Primary efficacy is change in modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) and secondary endpoints include standardized ColorFace® photography with high-resolution colorimetric analysis and dermatologic tolerance under real-use conditions. The trial excludes other causes of facial pigmentation and recent depigmenting treatments to isolate effects on melasma.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the cosmetic serum could provide comparable lightening of melasma with fewer irritant side effects than 4% hydroquinone.
How similar studies have gone: 4% hydroquinone is an established standard for melasma, while multi-ingredient dermocosmetic serums have shown modest benefits in some trials but generally have less robust long-term evidence than hydroquinone.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female subjects, primarily female, aged 18 to 65 years at the time of inclusion Fitzpatrick skin phototype II to V Diagnosed with mild to moderate epidermal or mixed-type facial melasma, confirmed by Wood's lamp examination mMASI score between 3.5 and 13 at baseline Subject is in general good health as assessed by the investigator based on medical history and clinical examination Willing to avoid excessive sun exposure and use only the provided SPF50+ sunscreen during the study Able to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent Willing and able to comply with study procedures and scheduled visits Women of childbearing potential must agree to use a reliable method of contraception for at least 3 months prior to and during the entire study duration Exclusion Criteria: Presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), lentigines, or other non-melasma facial pigmentation Use of topical or systemic depigmenting treatments, retinoids, corticosteroids, or hormonal treatments within 4 weeks prior to baseline Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational or comparator products Excessive sun exposure or use of tanning beds within 2 weeks before baseline or planned during the study Active skin diseases (e.g., atopic dermatitis, psoriasis) or damaged skin in the test area Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or those planning to become pregnant during the study Participation in another clinical trial within 4 weeks prior to the study or planned participation in another trial during the study History of malignancy in the past 10 years (except treated basal cell carcinoma) Uncontrolled systemic illness (e.g., diabetes, cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, or pulmonary disease) Any psychological or cognitive condition that would limit the subject's ability to understand the study procedures Current use of photosensitizing medications BMI \> 40 or other conditions that may affect protocol compliance as judged by the investigator
Where it's running
-
Centre International de Développement Pharmaceutique
Port Louis, Phoenix, Mauritius Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Dr Gitanjali PETKAR Principal Investigator (Dermatologist), (MBBS, DDV)
- Email: g.petkar@cidp-cro.com
- Phone: +2304012600
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Cosmetic gel for facial hyperpigmentation in women
This study tests a depigmenting gel to see if it improves facial dark spots in 40 women aged 30–60 over 90 days.
-
Ultrasound-enhanced delivery of tranexamic acid and glutathione for facial melasma
This trial will test whether using ultrasound to help the skin absorb a 10% tranexamic acid and 2% glutathione solution reduces facial melasma in adults aged 20–55.
-
Do Quercefit® or Ubiqsome™ help with aging and metabolic health in adults 50–75?
This study tests whether Quercefit® or Ubiqsome™ can improve aging markers, blood sugar, and heart health in sedentary adults aged 50–75 compared with a placebo.
-
NVTIA Ergothioneine for Healthy Aging and Skin Health
This study tests whether taking NVTIA Ergothioneine daily for 12 weeks helps healthy adults age more gracefully and keeps skin looking and feeling better compared with a placebo.
-
Miricell supplementation and markers of healthy aging
This trial tests whether taking Miricell once daily for 12 weeks improves cellular health and brain/metabolic indicators in adults aged 40–70 compared with a placebo.
-
Does daily lean beef support brain health in older adults
In healthy adults aged 65 and up, this study tests whether eating lean beef every day for two weeks can influence brain health markers compared with a non-beef, protein-matched option.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.