Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Copeptin test after mannitol vs hypertonic saline to diagnose PPS

Official title: Copeptin Measurement After Mannitol and Hypertonic Saline for the Diagnosis of Polyuria-polydipsia Syndrome

Run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · NCT07569861 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether a mannitol-based test can diagnose the cause of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome as accurately as the current hypertonic saline test, and which method patients prefer.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment144 (estimated)
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Basel)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJune 16, 2026
Main results expectedJune 2030
Study endsJune 2030
Registry record updatedJune 18, 2026
Trial IDNCT07569861 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults with suspected hypotonically defined PPS (polyuria >40 mL/kg/day and polydipsia >3 L/day) and either AVP deficiency or primary polydipsia, suitable for copeptin testing.

Probably not a fit

Patients with PPS due to conditions excluded by criteria or those unable to tolerate either test may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This randomized, cross-over, multicenter trial compares two copeptin-stimulated diagnostic tests for polyuria-polydipsia syndrome: mannitol infusion versus hypertonic saline infusion. Participants undergo both tests in random order to assess diagnostic accuracy, safety, tolerability, and patient preference. The study also explores whether additional clinical and laboratory measures can improve diagnostic precision. Eligible adults with hypotonic PPS and suspected AVP deficiency or primary polydipsia are included, while those with confounding medical conditions are excluded. Lead site is University Hospital Basel, with collaboration in Basel, Switzerland.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience a simpler, more comfortable diagnostic test with similar accuracy to the current standard.

How similar studies have gone: Early results in this area suggest potential diagnostic parity between mannitol and hypertonic saline approaches, but broader validation is needed.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. Hypotonic polyuria/polydipsia syndrome defined as polyuria \>40ml/kg body weight/24h and polydipsia \>3l/24h; and urine osmolality \<800mOsm/L or known AVP-D based on accepted criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Polyuria/polydipsia secondary to diabetes mellitus, hypercalcemia, or hypokalemia
2. Diagnosis of AVP-R (Copeptin \> 21.4 pmol/L)
3. Evidence of acute illness
4. Epilepsy requiring treatment
5. Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (blood pressure \>160/100mmHg at baseline
6. eGFR \< 60 ml/min/1,73 m2
7. Cardiac failure (NYHA III-IV)
8. Diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, Child-Pugh Class C
9. Uncorrected adrenal or thyroidal deficiency
10. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
11. Current or unresolved urinary obstruction
12. Enrollment in a clinical trial within the last 30 days
13. Patients refusing or unable to give written informed consent
14. Inability to follow study procedures

Where it's running

  • University Hospital Basel
    Basel, Switzerland
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.