Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Comparing XEN Glaucoma Gel Stent and Trabeculectomy for Glaucoma Treatment

Official title: Multicentric Evaluation of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the XEN Implant Versus Classic Trabeculectomy in Open Angle Glaucoma Subjects

Run by Paracelsus Medical University · NCT05439161 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing whether a new minimally invasive glaucoma implant works better than traditional surgery for improving vision in people with open angle glaucoma.

More Primary Open Angle Glaucoma trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment196 (estimated)
SponsorParacelsus Medical University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Salzburg)
StatusRecruiting
StartedDecember 20, 2023
Main results expectedMarch 31, 2026
Study endsSeptember 30, 2026
Registry record updatedJune 3, 2025
Trial IDNCT05439161 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older diagnosed with primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or pigmentary dispersion glaucoma who are eligible for both surgical procedures.

Probably not a fit

Patients with clinically significant cataracts or those requiring combined cataract surgery will not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study evaluates the effectiveness of the XEN implant compared to classic trabeculectomy in improving best corrected visual acuity in patients with open angle glaucoma. It is a multicentric, randomized trial involving up to 196 eyes, where eligible patients will be assigned to either the XEN implant or trabeculectomy group. Both procedures are standard surgical treatments for glaucoma, with the XEN implant being a minimally invasive option that avoids conjunctival dissection. The study aims to gather data on postoperative outcomes to determine which procedure offers better visual acuity results.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide insights into which surgical approach offers better visual outcomes for glaucoma patients.

How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown varying success with both surgical approaches, but this specific comparison of the XEN implant versus trabeculectomy is relatively novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Diagnosis of open angle glaucoma (Primary open angle glaucoma, Pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, Pigmentary dispersion glaucoma)
2. Clinically eligible for both surgeries (Trabeculectomy and XEN) on the discretion of the surgeon (area of healthy, free and mobile conjunctiva in the superior nasal target quadrant)
3. VA logMAR ≤ 1 (VA dec ≥ 0.1)
4. Trabecular meshwork must be visible (with Shaffer angle grade \> 1 in the target quadrant)
5. Age 18 years or older
6. Patient understands the nature of the procedure, is willing to comply with associated follow-up evaluations, and provides written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Clinical significant cataract
2. Subject has had prior cataract surgery in study eye ≤ 1 months (count to operation)
3. Subject has had prior (incisional) glaucoma surgery (XEN, trabeculectomy, viscocanalostomy, canaloplasty, shunts of any type, collagen implants, etc.). Prior iridotomy is acceptable.
4. Phacic Angle Closure Glaucoma
5. Subject has neovascular, uveitic or angle recession glaucoma or any glaucoma associated with vascular disorders
6. Active inflammation (e.g., blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, uveitis)
7. Anterior chamber intraocular lens
8. Vitreous present in the anterior chamber
9. Presence of intraocular silicone oil
10. History of corneal surgery, corneal opacities, or corneal disease
11. Impaired episcleral venous drainage (e.g. Sturge-Weber or nanophthalmos)
12. History of dermatologic keloid formation
13. Active diabetic retinopathy, proliferative retinopathy, choroidal neovascularization, branch retinal vein occlusion, central retinal vein occlusion, or other ophthalmic disease or disorder that could confound study results
14. Known or suspected allergy or sensitivity to drugs required for the surgical procedure or any of the device components (e.g., porcine products or glutaraldehyde),
15. Pregnant or nursing women

Where it's running

  • Dept. Ophthalmology and Optometry Paracelsus Medical University
    Salzburg, Austria
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.