Comparing Volrustomig with Pembrolizumab for Lung Cancer Treatment
Official title: A Phase III, Two-Arm, Parallel, Randomized, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Global Study to Determine the Efficacy of Volrustomig (MEDI5752) Plus Chemotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (mNSCLC).
Run by AstraZeneca · NCT05984277 · Data updated 2026-05-14
This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.
This study is testing whether a new treatment called volrustomig combined with chemotherapy works better than pembrolizumab with chemotherapy for people with advanced lung cancer that has low PD-L1 levels.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 3 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 900 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | AstraZeneca Industry-sponsored |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation, pembrolizumab, chemotherapy |
| Locations | 289 sites (Prescott, Arizona and 288 other locations) |
| Trial ID | NCT05984277 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults with stage IV metastatic non-small cell lung cancer lacking specific genetic alterations and who are not eligible for curative surgery or radiation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with mixed small-cell lung cancer, symptomatic brain metastases, or certain rare tumor subtypes may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of volrustomig combined with chemotherapy compared to pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have low PD-L1 expression. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two treatment regimens, and their tumors will be monitored for response until disease progression. The study will also track patient survival until its conclusion, with oversight from an independent data monitoring committee to ensure safety.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a new effective treatment option for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown promising results with similar immunotherapy approaches, but this specific combination is being tested for the first time.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: * Histologically or cytologically documented squamous or non-squamous NSCLC. * Stage IV NSCLC (according to Version 8 of the IASLC Staging Manual in Thoracic Oncology 2016), not amenable to curative surgery or radiation. * Absence of sensitizing EGFR mutations and ALK and ROS1 rearrangements. * Absence of documented tumor genomic alteration results from tests conducted as part of standard local practice in any other actionable driver oncogenes for which there are locally approved targeted first-line therapies. Key Exclusion Criteria: * Mixed small-cell lung cancer and NSCLC histology or sarcomatoid variant. Rare subtypes are excluded. * Spinal cord compression. * Symptomatic brain metastases. Brain metastases may be treated or untreated, but participants must be asymptomatic and off steroids for at least 14 days prior to start of study intervention. A minimum of 2 weeks must have elapsed between the end of whole brain radiotherapy and study enrollment. * History of another primary malignancy except for: 1. Malignancy treated with curative intent with no known active disease ≥ 2 years before the first dose of study intervention and of low potential risk for recurrence. 2. Adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or lentigo maligna without evidence of disease. 3. Adequately treated carcinoma in situ without evidence of disease. * As judged by the investigator, any condition that would interfere with evaluation of the study intervention or interpretation of participant safety or study results.
Where it's running
-
Research Site
Prescott, Arizona, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Springdale, Arkansas, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Lone Tree, Colorado, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Fort Myers, Florida, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Orlando, Florida, United States Recruiting
Show 44 more locations
-
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Des Moines, Iowa, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Louisville, Kentucky, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Annapolis, Maryland, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Baltimore, Maryland, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Silver Spring, Maryland, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Towson, Maryland, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Detroit, Michigan, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Grand Island, Nebraska, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Omaha, Nebraska, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
East Syracuse, New York, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Westbury, New York, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Dayton, Ohio, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Portland, Oregon, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Horsham, Pennsylvania, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Memphis, Tennessee, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Nashville, Tennessee, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Houston, Texas, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Lancaster, Texas, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Fairfax, Virginia, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Henrico, Virginia, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Tacoma, Washington, United States Recruiting -
Research Site
Caba, Argentina Recruiting -
Research Site
Ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina Recruiting -
Research Site
Córdoba, Argentina Recruiting -
Research Site
La Plata, Argentina Recruiting -
Research Site
La Plata, Argentina Recruiting -
Research Site
Rosario, Argentina Recruiting -
Research Site
Clayton, Australia Recruiting -
Research Site
Fitzroy, Australia Recruiting -
Research Site
Heidelberg, Australia Recruiting -
Research Site
South Brisbane, Australia Recruiting -
Research Site
Sydney, Australia Recruiting -
Research Site
Linz, Austria Recruiting -
Research Site
Wels, Austria Recruiting -
Research Site
Aalst, Belgium Recruiting -
Research Site
Antwerpen, Belgium Recruiting -
Research Site
Gent, Belgium Recruiting
+239 more sites. See ClinicalTrials.gov for the full list.
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center
- Email: information.center@astrazeneca.com
- Phone: 1-877-240-9479
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
PF-08634404 plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
This will test whether PF-08634404 combined with chemotherapy works better than pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for adults with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who have not received prior treatment for their advanced disease.
-
Morning vs Flexible Timing Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
This study tests whether giving pembrolizumab in the morning is better or the same as standard timing for people with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who are eligible for this treatment.
-
Using electric fields with immunotherapy and chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer
This study is testing whether using electric fields along with immunotherapy and chemotherapy can help people with advanced lung cancer live longer and feel better compared to standard treatments alone.
-
Treatment for advanced lung cancer with KRAS G12C mutation
This study is testing a new treatment called adagrasib, alone and with another drug called pembrolizumab, to see if it helps people with advanced lung cancer that has a specific mutation.
-
Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab With or Without SBRT for Metastatic Kidney Cancer
This study tests whether adding SBRT to standard lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab helps people with metastatic kidney cancer who have stable disease after initial treatment.
-
Bladder cancer: test a biomarker-guided plan after neoadjuvant therapy
This phase 2 study tests a biomarker- and response-guided plan to preserve the bladder in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.