Comparing Urokinase and Alteplase for Treating Acute Ischemic Stroke
Official title: Treatment of Acute Ischemic StroKe With Intravenous UroKinase Real-world Research: a Multicenter, Prospective Study (TASK-UK)
Run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · NCT06194968 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing if a cheaper medication called urokinase works as well and is as safe as the more expensive drug alteplase for treating people with acute ischemic stroke.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 1800 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Academic / other |
| Locations | 16 sites (Lanzhou, Gansu and 15 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 30, 2023 |
| Main results expected | November 1, 2025 |
| Study ends | December 1, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 8, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT06194968 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 18 and older who have been clinically diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke and are eligible for treatment with intravenous urokinase or alteplase.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with contraindications for thrombolysis or those who do not meet the inclusion criteria will not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of intravenous urokinase versus intravenous alteplase in treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients within 6 hours of symptom onset. It will be a multicenter, real-world observational study that analyzes the outcomes of patients treated with both medications. The research will focus on evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and economic implications of using urokinase, which is significantly cheaper than alteplase. By exploring different dosages of urokinase and relevant risk factors, the study seeks to provide valuable data for future assessments of urokinase's clinical effects.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a more affordable and effective treatment option for patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke.
How similar studies have gone: While existing evidence on urokinase's effectiveness is mixed, this study aims to provide new insights and data that could support its use in treating acute ischemic stroke.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:Age: ≥18 years. Clinical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke, defined as an event characterized by the sudden onset of an acute focal neurologic deficit, unilateral motor dysfunction or impairment of language presumed to be due to cerebral ischemia after, with imaging evidence of a causative lesion or symptoms/signs persisting for over 24 hours. CT scan should exclude hemorrhage and non-vascular etiology. First-time occurrence or a history of stroke without significant neurological deficits (baseline mRS score ≤ 1). Eligible for treatment with intravenous administration of urokinase or alteplase as assessed by the investigators. Patient is willing to participate voluntarily and to sign a written patient informed consent. Informed consent will be obtained from each patient or the subject's legally authorized representative or relatives, or deferred where applicable. \- Exclusion Criteria:Contraindications for thrombolysis (refer to the 2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke, intravenous thrombolysis contraindications). Female of childbearing potential who is known to be pregnant and/or lactating or who has a positive pregnancy test on admission. Known history of drug (narcotics, controlled substances) abuse or addiction in the past year. Has an expected survival of less than 90 days due to concurrent malignant tumors or severe systemic diseases Incapable to comply with the protocol due to mental illness or cognitive disorder. Paticipants of any interventional drug or device clinical trials within 3 months prior to screening. Unsuitable for this study in the opinion of the investigators. \-
Where it's running
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou, Henan, China Recruiting -
The First People's Hospital of Lanzhou City
Lanzhou, Gansu, China Not yet recruiting -
Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University
Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China Not yet recruiting -
Beiliu People's Hospital
Beiliu, Guangxi, China Not yet recruiting -
Guidong People's Hospital of Guangxi zhuang Autonomous Region
Guidong, Guangxi, China Not yet recruiting -
Tengxian People's Hospital
Wuzhou, Guangxi, China Not yet recruiting
Show 10 more locations
-
Red Cross Hospital of Yulin City
Yulin, Guangxi, China Not yet recruiting -
The First People's Hospital of Yulin
Yulin, Guangxi, China Not yet recruiting -
Sanya People's Hospital
Sanya, Hainan, China Not yet recruiting -
The First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University
Jiamusi, Heilongjiang, China Not yet recruiting -
The People's Hospital of Anyang City
Anyang, Henan, China Not yet recruiting -
Kaifeng Central Hospital
Kaifeng, Henan, China Not yet recruiting -
The Second People's Hospital of Mengjin District
Luoyang, Henan, China Not yet recruiting -
Pingdingshan The Second People's Hospital
Pingdingshan, Henan, China Not yet recruiting -
Huiji District People's Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, China Not yet recruiting -
Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Minzu University
Tongliao, Inner Mongolia, China Not yet recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Short-Term outside-in nerve stimulation for acute ischemic stroke
This trial tests whether a 5-day external trigeminal nerve stimulation given after stroke can help more patients recover better than a sham treatment.
-
Sevoflurane vs. Propofol for anesthesia in stroke patients undergoing clot-removal
This study tests whether sevoflurane or propofol used for anesthesia during endovascular treatment of an acute ischemic stroke affects the final brain damage and recovery.
-
Safety of adding NRICM301 to standard care for adults with acute ischemic stroke
This study tests whether adding NRICM301, a traditional Chinese medicine formula, to usual care is safe for adults with acute ischemic stroke.
-
Intracranial Recanalization with LT3001 in Acute Ischemic Stroke
This phase II study tests whether LT3001 given to adults with acute ischemic stroke can help reopen blocked brain arteries.
-
Mobilisation After Endovascular Stroke Treatment
This study checks whether moving around 12 hours after endovascular stroke treatment is as safe as moving around 24 hours for people with an acute ischemic stroke.
-
Endovascular therapy plus standard care vs standard care alone for distal and medium vessel strokes
In people with acute ischemic stroke due to distal or medium vessel blockages, this study tests whether adding endovascular treatment to the usual medical care helps improve outcomes compared with medical care alone.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.