Comparing ultrasound biofeedback with traditional therapy for chronic low back pain
Official title: Comparison of Abdominal Draw-in Maneuver With Real-time Ultrasound Imaging Biofeedback vs Conservative Physical Therapy in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
Run by Abant Izzet Baysal University · NCT06856642 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing if using ultrasound feedback to help people with chronic low back pain can work better than traditional physical therapy.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 30 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Abant Izzet Baysal University Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Bolu) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | February 28, 2026 |
| Study ends | February 28, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | March 6, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06856642 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18-65 with chronic nonspecific low back pain lasting at least 3 months.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with neuropathic pain, recent lumbar interventions, or significant neurological conditions may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver combined with real-time ultrasound biofeedback against conservative physical therapy in patients suffering from chronic nonspecific low back pain. Chronic low back pain is a prevalent issue that can severely impact physical and mental health, necessitating a multidisciplinary treatment approach. The study utilizes ultrasound biofeedback to provide real-time visualization of muscle activity, allowing patients to adjust their movements and improve their condition. Participants will be monitored over a specified period to assess the outcomes of both treatment methods.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could offer a more effective treatment option for patients with chronic low back pain.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown promise in using biofeedback techniques for rehabilitation, suggesting potential success for this approach.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * The duration of low back pain is at least 3 months. * Low back pain with or without radiation to the lower extremities. * Age between 18-65 years. * Chronic nonspecific low back pain patients. Exclusion Criteria: * Neuropathic pain complaints. * Pregnancy status. * History of infection, cancer, or trauma. * Neurological abnormalities. * History of lumbar spine surgery. * History of conservative physical therapy and/or injections in the lumbar region within the last 6 months. * Neurological diseases such as Parkinson's or Multiple Sclerosis. * Systemic diseases that prevent exercise. * Patients with a Mini-Mental Test score below 24.
Where it's running
-
Abant Izzet Baysal University
Bolu, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Serdar KILINÇ
- Email: drserdarkilinc@hotmail.com
- Phone: +90 5055913181
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Exercise effect on the lumbar multifidus in back pain
This study tests whether a 12-week home rehab program can change ultrasound features of the lumbar multifidus and reduce pain in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain from multifidus injury.
-
McGill Stabilization Exercises vs Sahrmann Movement-Based Exercises for Chronic Low Back Pain
This trial tests whether McGill stabilization exercises or Sahrmann's movement-based exercises better reduce pain and improve motion and function in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain.
-
Whole-body vibration vs. Pilates for chronic low back pain in young adults
This trial tests whether whole-body vibration or Pilates, each with standard physiotherapy, better reduces pain and improves balance and function in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain.
-
High-Intensity Interval Training vs Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain
This study tests whether a high-intensity interval training program helps reduce pain and improve function more than a moderate, steady-paced program in adults with chronic, non-specific low back pain.
-
Isokinetic Profile of Ankle Muscles in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain Patients
This study tests how ankle muscle performance differs in men with chronic non-specific low back pain compared with typical expectations, using isokinetic testing to explore links between pain, function, and fatigue.
-
VR-MBCT for chronic nonspecific low back pain
A multi-center trial will test whether adding virtual reality-based mindfulness therapy to usual care helps adults with chronic nonspecific low back pain feel better and move more in 8 weeks.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.