Comparing two ways to open chronic total coronary artery blockages: antegrade dissection-and-reentry versus retrograde approach.
Official title: Antegrade Dissection and Re-entry Versus Retrograde Strategy in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Run by National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland · NCT06878729 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This test will compare whether the antegrade dissection-and-reentry or the retrograde approach works better and is safer for people with difficult chronic total coronary occlusions who need PCI.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 74 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 3 sites (Warsaw, Warsaw and 2 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 28, 2025 |
| Main results expected | March 31, 2028 |
| Study ends | September 30, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | January 2, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06878729 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults with symptomatic or ischemia-driven native CTOs of at least J-CTO score ≥2 who are judged by two independent operators to be equally suitable for either ADR or retrograde PCI and who can undergo CMR and provide informed consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with easy or intermediate CTOs (J-CTO <2), acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, contraindications to PCI or CMR, pregnancy, or limited life expectancy are unlikely to benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
ADRENALINE is a multicenter, randomized study enrolling patients with difficult chronic total coronary occlusions (J-CTO score ≥2) who are angiographically suitable for either approach. Patients who have failed or not attempted primary antegrade wiring are randomized 1:1 to receive antegrade dissection-and-reentry (ADR) or a retrograde crossing strategy, while those with successful antegrade wiring are followed in an observational arm. Pre- and postprocedure evaluation includes cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement, serial cardiac biomarkers, and health-status questionnaires, and outcomes include procedure time, guidewire crossing success, periprocedural complications, myocardial injury, and operator stress. Follow-up health status is reassessed at 3 months and CMR is repeated within five days after the procedure.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could identify which crossing strategy shortens procedure time, lowers complications, and improves recovery for patients with difficult CTO undergoing PCI.
How similar studies have gone: Both ADR and retrograde CTO techniques are established in observational and registry data, but randomized head-to-head comparisons are limited, making this a relatively under-tested direct comparison.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * clinical indication for CTO PCI as determined by the local heart team (presence of angina or equivalent symptoms and/or documented ischemia or viability) * at least difficult native CTO lesion with J-CTO difficulty score ≥2 points on invasive angiography * angiographic suitability for both ADR and the retrograde strategy as assessed by 2 independent hybrid CTO PCI operators * informed consent for participation in the study Exclusion Criteria: * \<18 years of age * acute myocardial infarction * cardiogenic shock * severe valvular disease * estimated life expectancy \<1 year * contraindication to PCI * contrast allergy * positive pregnancy test or breast-feeding * native CTO lesion with easy or intermediate difficulty score on invasive angiography (J-CTO score \<2 points) * lack of angiographic equipoise between the ADR and the retrograde strategy as assessed by 2 independent hybrid CTO PCI operators
Where it's running
-
National Institute of Cardiology
Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland Recruiting -
1st Military Clinical Hospital
Lublin, Poland Recruiting -
Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration
Lublin, Poland Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Maksymilian Opolski — National Institute of Cardiology
- Study coordinator: Katarzyna Istynowicz
- Email: kistynowicz@ikard.pl
- Phone: 0048223434268
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Aspirin 50 mg vs 100 mg with a P2Y12 inhibitor after PCI
This trial tests whether a 50 mg daily aspirin dose, when used with a P2Y12 inhibitor after PCI, works as well as 100 mg with similar safety for people staying on DAPT for 12 months.
-
PCI Registry at University Hospital Basel for Complex Coronary Procedures
This registry collects real-world data from adults undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions at University Hospital Basel to see how different treatments like drug-eluting stents, drug-coated balloons, and bioresorbable scaffolds perform in diverse patients.
-
Long-term P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy and blood clotting after angioplasty
This trial will test whether specific P2Y12 drugs and reduced doses given alone keep platelet activity in a safe therapeutic range for people who completed initial dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI.
-
What affects bleeding control and how long you need to lie flat after femoral arterial sheath removal
We will see if patient and procedure factors can predict how long ICU patients need compression and bed rest after femoral arterial sheath removal to prevent bleeding and hematoma.
-
Doctors' and patients' preferences for PCI implantation devices
This questionnaire tests what patients who have had PCI and the doctors who treat them prefer between drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons.
-
How patients and doctors value different outcomes after coronary stent procedures
This project asks patients who had a coronary stent (PCI) and the doctors who treat them to rate how important different possible outcomes are to see if their priorities match.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.