Clinical trial Recruiting at 3 sites Interventional Ages 18 and up

Comparing two ways to open chronic total coronary artery blockages: antegrade dissection-and-reentry versus retrograde approach.

Official title: Antegrade Dissection and Re-entry Versus Retrograde Strategy in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Run by National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland · NCT06878729 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This test will compare whether the antegrade dissection-and-reentry or the retrograde approach works better and is safer for people with difficult chronic total coronary occlusions who need PCI.

More Coronary Artery Disease trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment74 (estimated)
SponsorNational Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
Academic / other
Drugs / interventionsradiation
Locations3 sites (Warsaw, Warsaw and 2 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJuly 28, 2025
Main results expectedMarch 31, 2028
Study endsSeptember 30, 2028
Registry record updatedJanuary 2, 2026
Trial IDNCT06878729 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults with symptomatic or ischemia-driven native CTOs of at least J-CTO score ≥2 who are judged by two independent operators to be equally suitable for either ADR or retrograde PCI and who can undergo CMR and provide informed consent.

Probably not a fit

Patients with easy or intermediate CTOs (J-CTO <2), acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, contraindications to PCI or CMR, pregnancy, or limited life expectancy are unlikely to benefit from participation.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

ADRENALINE is a multicenter, randomized study enrolling patients with difficult chronic total coronary occlusions (J-CTO score ≥2) who are angiographically suitable for either approach. Patients who have failed or not attempted primary antegrade wiring are randomized 1:1 to receive antegrade dissection-and-reentry (ADR) or a retrograde crossing strategy, while those with successful antegrade wiring are followed in an observational arm. Pre- and postprocedure evaluation includes cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement, serial cardiac biomarkers, and health-status questionnaires, and outcomes include procedure time, guidewire crossing success, periprocedural complications, myocardial injury, and operator stress. Follow-up health status is reassessed at 3 months and CMR is repeated within five days after the procedure.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could identify which crossing strategy shortens procedure time, lowers complications, and improves recovery for patients with difficult CTO undergoing PCI.

How similar studies have gone: Both ADR and retrograde CTO techniques are established in observational and registry data, but randomized head-to-head comparisons are limited, making this a relatively under-tested direct comparison.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* clinical indication for CTO PCI as determined by the local heart team (presence of angina or equivalent symptoms and/or documented ischemia or viability)
* at least difficult native CTO lesion with J-CTO difficulty score ≥2 points on invasive angiography
* angiographic suitability for both ADR and the retrograde strategy as assessed by 2 independent hybrid CTO PCI operators
* informed consent for participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

* \<18 years of age
* acute myocardial infarction
* cardiogenic shock
* severe valvular disease
* estimated life expectancy \<1 year
* contraindication to PCI
* contrast allergy
* positive pregnancy test or breast-feeding
* native CTO lesion with easy or intermediate difficulty score on invasive angiography (J-CTO score \<2 points)
* lack of angiographic equipoise between the ADR and the retrograde strategy as assessed by 2 independent hybrid CTO PCI operators

Where it's running

  • National Institute of Cardiology
    Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
    Recruiting
  • 1st Military Clinical Hospital
    Lublin, Poland
    Recruiting
  • Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration
    Lublin, Poland
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: Maksymilian Opolski — National Institute of Cardiology
  • Study coordinator: Katarzyna Istynowicz
  • Email: kistynowicz@ikard.pl
  • Phone: 0048223434268

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.