Comparing two types of spacers for treating knee joint infections

Durable, Real-component Antibiotic Spacers vs All-cement Articulating Spacers for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection

Not applicable Interventional Northwestern University · NCT06293352

This study is testing which type of spacer works better for treating knee joint infections in patients who have had knee replacement surgery.

Quick facts

PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment153 (estimated)
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
SponsorNorthwestern University Academic / other
Locations1 site (Chicago, Illinois)
Trial IDNCT06293352 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

This study compares two treatment methods for chronic periprosthetic joint infections following total knee arthroplasty. One method uses an all-cement articulating spacer, while the other employs a durable, real-component articulating spacer. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two cohorts, and their outcomes will be assessed through preoperative patient-reported outcomes questionnaires administered via iPad or online. The goal is to determine which spacer type leads to better infection management and patient outcomes.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Ideal candidates are patients diagnosed with chronic periprosthetic joint infections after a primary total knee arthroplasty who are scheduled for explant and placement of an antibiotic spacer.

Not a fit: Patients with infections at the site of revision, significant soft tissue compromise, or those unable to consent may not benefit from this study.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve treatment options for patients with knee joint infections, potentially leading to better recovery and fewer complications.

How similar studies have performed: While the approach of using different types of spacers is established, this specific comparison has not been extensively tested, making it a novel investigation.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients diagnosed with a chronic periprosthetic joint infection after a primary total knee arthroplasty with plan for explant and placement of an antibiotic spacer
* PJI defined according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2018 Consensus Criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients who are unable to consent
* Infection at site of revision TKA
* Soft tissue envelope compromise
* Allergies to study materials (cement, vancomycin, tobramycin)
* Incompetent extensor mechanism
* Extensive bone loss

Randomization-specific exclusion criteria

* Extensive soft tissue defect
* Extensor mechanism compromise

Where this trial is running

Chicago, Illinois

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions Prosthetic-joint InfectionKnee InfectionArthroplasty ComplicationsJoint InfectionArthroplasty, Replacement, Kneerandomized trialpatient-reported outcomes
Last reviewed 2026-06-13 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.