Comparing two types of spacers for treating knee joint infections
Official title: Durable, Real-component Antibiotic Spacers vs All-cement Articulating Spacers for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection
Run by Northwestern University · NCT06293352 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing which type of spacer works better for treating knee joint infections in patients who have had knee replacement surgery.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 153 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Northwestern University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Chicago, Illinois) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 8, 2024 |
| Main results expected | August 2027 |
| Study ends | August 2028 |
| Registry record updated | August 24, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06293352 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are patients diagnosed with chronic periprosthetic joint infections after a primary total knee arthroplasty who are scheduled for explant and placement of an antibiotic spacer.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with infections at the site of revision, significant soft tissue compromise, or those unable to consent may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study compares two treatment methods for chronic periprosthetic joint infections following total knee arthroplasty. One method uses an all-cement articulating spacer, while the other employs a durable, real-component articulating spacer. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two cohorts, and their outcomes will be assessed through preoperative patient-reported outcomes questionnaires administered via iPad or online. The goal is to determine which spacer type leads to better infection management and patient outcomes.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve treatment options for patients with knee joint infections, potentially leading to better recovery and fewer complications.
How similar studies have gone: While the approach of using different types of spacers is established, this specific comparison has not been extensively tested, making it a novel investigation.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients diagnosed with a chronic periprosthetic joint infection after a primary total knee arthroplasty with plan for explant and placement of an antibiotic spacer * PJI defined according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2018 Consensus Criteria Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who are unable to consent * Infection at site of revision TKA * Soft tissue envelope compromise * Allergies to study materials (cement, vancomycin, tobramycin) * Incompetent extensor mechanism * Extensive bone loss Randomization-specific exclusion criteria * Extensive soft tissue defect * Extensor mechanism compromise
Where it's running
-
Northwestern Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Adam I Edelstein, MD — Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
- Study coordinator: Melissa J Shauver, MPH
- Email: melissa.shauver@northwestern.edu
- Phone: 312-472-6024
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Tau changes after hip or knee replacement surgery
Researchers will see if brain tau changes after hip or knee surgery and whether these changes relate to inflammation and thinking abilities.
-
How knee and hip joint replacements are doing over time
This observational study follows adults who have knee or hip replacements to see how their outcomes look over time after the surgery.
-
Population pharmacokinetics of rifampicin in staphylococcal osteoarticular infections
This study tests how rifampicin behaves in the body of adults with staphylococcal osteoarticular infections when given with levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin, to see how drug exposure relates to tolerance and outcomes.
-
Ultrasound predictors of adductor canal block success after knee replacement
This study tests whether ultrasound factors can predict how well an adductor canal block will relieve pain after total knee arthroplasty in adults.
-
Rebound Pain After Knee Replacement: Does It Link to Long-Term Pain?
This study tests whether rebound pain after a nerve block during knee replacement is linked to developing chronic pain later on.
-
Reducing bacterial contamination during primary shoulder replacement
This trial tests whether putting Prontosan antimicrobial gel on the dermal layer after the skin is cut can lower Cutibacterium acnes growth in men having primary shoulder replacement.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.