Comparing two types of radiation therapy for painful bone metastases
Official title: A Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) vs Conventional Palliative Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases
Run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center · NCT06065449 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether a new type of radiation therapy can help people with painful bone metastases feel better compared to the standard treatment.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 3 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 220 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Houston, Texas) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 24, 2024 |
| Main results expected | June 27, 2027 |
| Study ends | June 27, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | January 14, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06065449 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include adults with a diagnosis of solid primary malignancy and painful bone metastases, who can complete pain assessments and have a life expectancy of at least three months.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with multiple myeloma or those under 18 years of age may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) against conventional palliative radiation therapy in patients suffering from painful bone metastases. The study will assess pain response at various intervals post-treatment, using established criteria to evaluate outcomes. Secondary objectives include analyzing local failure rates, narcotics utilization, re-irradiation rates, and overall survival, as well as assessing quality of life and toxicity associated with both treatment approaches.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a more effective pain management option for patients with bone metastases.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown promising results with SBRT for similar conditions, indicating potential for success in this approach.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with pathologic diagnosis of solid primary malignancy with any radiographic report of bone metastases including but not limited to plain x-ray, bone scan, CT scan, MRI, PET/CT scan, PSMA scan, PET fluciclovine scan. The exception is patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma are eligible. * Patients with any pain or discomfort at proposed treatment site. * Patients with life expectancy of 3 months or greater. * Patients able to complete pain assessment and quality of life surveys. * Patients with multiple osseous sites are eligible; however, should not treat more than three separate isocenters concurrently. Additional isocenters can be treated sequentially. * Patients with prior surgery for osseous metastases are eligible. * Patients age 18 years or older. Pediatric patients are usually enrolled on pediatric protocols. There are no adverse data available for patients \< 18 years of age treated with SBRT, therefore children are excluded from this study. * Patients may receive systemic therapy including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or other systemic agents up to and during radiation at treating physician's discretion per standard of care. * Patients must have adequate organ and marrow function as defined below: platelets ≥ 40,000/mcL * Patients with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment does not have the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen are eligible for this trial. * The effects of radiation therapy on the developing human fetus are unknown. For this reason and because radiation therapy as well as other therapeutic agents used in this trial are known to be teratogenic, women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. (Refer to Pregnancy Assessment Policy MD Anderson Institutional Policy # CLN1114). This includes all female patients, between the onset of menses (as early as 8 years of age) and 55 years unless the patient presents with an applicable exclusionary factor which may be one of the following: 1. Postmenopausal (no menses in greater than or equal to 12 consecutive months) 2. History of hysterectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. 3. Ovarian Failure (Follicle Stimulating Hormone and Estradiol in menopausal range, who have received Whole Pelvic Radiation Therapy) 4. History of bilateral tubal ligation or another surgical sterilization procedure. * Approved methods of birth control are as follows: Hormonal contraception (i.e. birth control pills, injection, implant, transdermal patch, vaginal ring), Intrauterine device (IUD), Tubal Ligation or hysterectomy, Subject/Partner post vasectomy, Implantable or injectable contraceptives, and condoms plus spermicide. Not engaging in sexual activity for the total duration of the trial and the drug washout period is an acceptable practice; however periodic abstinence, the rhythm method, and the withdrawal method are not acceptable methods of birth control. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. * Men treated or enrolled on this protocol must also agree to use adequate contraception prior to the study, for the duration of study participation, and 2 weeks after completion of radiation therapy. * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with prior radiation therapy to the proposed treatment site. * Patient with current, un-treated cord compression at treatment site. * Patients with a radiographic or pathologic fracture at the proposed treatment site that is not mechanically stable. If this is stabilized mechanically or seen by orthopedic surgery, this site is eligible for enrollment and treated on protocol * Patients with metastases to hand and feet. * Patients with previously treated with radioactive isotope (e.g. Sr 89) within 30 days of randomization. This can have concomitant effects with radiation therapy. * Patients with spinal metastases along cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine are not eligible. However, if the primary site invades the paraspinal or spine region, these are eligible. * Pregnant patients are not eligible.
Where it's running
-
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Quynh Nguyen, M D — M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
- Study coordinator: Quynh Nguyen, M D
- Email: qnnguyen@mdanderson.org
- Phone: (713) 563-2450
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Prophylactic Radiotherapy to Prevent Bone Complications in Metastatic Cancers
This study tests whether giving early radiotherapy to high-risk bone metastases, in addition to standard care, can reduce bone-related problems in adults with metastatic solid cancers.
-
Focused high-dose SBRT for spinal tumors
This program will try focused high-dose SBRT for adults with spinal metastases to track side effects and local tumor control during routine care.
-
Registry for people with symptomatic bone metastases
This registry collects health information from adults with symptomatic bone metastases who need treatment for painful or unstable bone lesions to learn more about outcomes and care.
-
One-visit, simulation-free single-dose radiation for painful bone metastases
This trial tests whether adults with one or two painful bone metastases can get pain-relieving radiation in a single visit using a simulation-free planning approach.
-
Dual Energy CT to Delineate Tumors and Organs at Risk in Radiotherapy
This study tests whether dual-energy CT can delineate tumors and nearby critical tissues as well as MRI for patients needing radiotherapy.
-
Early radiotherapy versus observation for high‑risk painless or minimally painful bone metastases
This will test whether giving preventive radiotherapy to people with high‑risk but painless or minimally painful bone metastases can reduce future bone complications, hospital stays, and symptoms compared with observation and usual treatment.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.