Comparing two types of PRP injections for hip osteoarthritis treatment
Official title: Use of Leukocyte-Rich PRP or Leukocyte-Free PRP in the Treatment of Hip Osteoarthritis. Double-blind Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial
Run by Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · NCT05497349 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether two different types of PRP injections can help people with hip osteoarthritis feel better over a year.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 35 Years to 70 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 230 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Bologna) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 5, 2022 |
| Main results expected | October 2026 |
| Study ends | October 2026 |
| Registry record updated | September 24, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT05497349 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are individuals with unilateral hip osteoarthritis showing specific pain and radiographic signs.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with significant comorbidities or those who have undergone recent joint surgeries may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma (LR-PRP) versus leukocyte-free platelet-rich plasma (LP-PRP) in treating hip osteoarthritis over a 12-month period. A total of 230 patients with hip OA will be randomly assigned to receive either LR-PRP or LP-PRP injections, with three infiltrations administered. The primary outcome will be assessed using the WOMAC score, along with other clinical evaluations conducted at 2, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. The study will help clarify the role of leukocytes in PRP efficacy for joint health.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a more effective treatment option for patients suffering from hip osteoarthritis.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown varying results regarding the efficacy of different PRP preparations, making this approach both relevant and necessary for further investigation.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Signs and symptoms of hip OA (pain intensity of at least 4 points and not more than 8 of VAS pain - 0-10 scale in the previous week); * Radiographic signs of hip OA (Grade 1-2 according to Tonnis classification) or MRI signs (chondropathy or minimal labrum degeneration without acute lesions) even if Grade 0. * Unilateral involvement; Hemoglobin \> 11 g/dl; * Platelet count \> 150,000 plt/mm3 (Recently performed CBC examination); * Negative serological tests for HBsAg, HCV Ab, HIV-1-2 Ab * No clinically significant electrocardiographic changes (Recently performed ECG). * Ability and consent of patients to actively participate in clinical follow-up;- Signature of informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients unable to express consent; * Patients undergoing infiltration of other substance in the previous 6 months; * Patients undergoing lower limb surgery to be treated in the previous 12 months; * Patients with malignant neoplasms; * Patients with rheumatic diseases;- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes;-Patients with hematological diseases (coagulopathies); * Patients on anticoagulant-antiaggregant therapy that cannot be discontinued for at least 3 days prior to blood collection; * Patients with uncontrolled thyroid metabolic disorders; * Patients abusing alcoholic beverages, drugs or medications; * Body Mass Index \> 30; * Patients who have taken NSAIDs in the 3 days prior to blood draw; * Patients with cardiovascular disease for whom 300 ml blood draw would be contraindicated; * Patients with recently performed CBC examination with Hb\< 11 g/dl and Platelet values \< 150,000 plt/mm3. * Positive serological tests for HBsAg, HCV Ab, HIV-1-2 Ab * Pregnant and/or fertile women. * Pain intensity less than 4 points or greater than 8 in accordance with the VAS scale. * Patients with other hip pathologies: acetabular protrusion, concentric migration of the femoral head, presence of excessive deformity resulting from acetabular or femoral head dysplasia, collapse deformity, and deformed femoral head sequelae of Perthes disease or osteonecrosis of the femoral head. * Previous extensive surgery of the reference joint (osteotomy around the hip, open or arthroscopic osteochondroplasty for femoro-acetabular conflict).
Where it's running
-
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, Italy Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Dante Dallari, MD — Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
- Study coordinator: Dante Dallari, MD
- Email: dante.dallari@ior.it
- Phone: 6366318
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Ceramic hip resurfacing vs total hip arthroplasty for hip OA
This trial tests whether ceramic hip resurfacing helps people with hip OA walk farther each day than a modern total hip replacement.
-
Dexmedetomidine during hip replacement to modulate nerves and inflammation
A randomized, placebo-controlled study tests whether intravenous dexmedetomidine given during spinal anesthesia with a PENG nerve block can help regulate the body's stress and inflammatory response and improve recovery after hip replacement.
-
Preoperative Fasting to Shape the Gut with Hip Replacement
This trial tests whether a 20-day preoperative fasting plan can lower inflammatory signals and broaden gut microbes in adults undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
-
Cryoneurolysis for Chronic Pain: 6- and 12-Month Outcomes in Routine Care
This study tests whether cryoneurolysis, done as part of standard care for people with chronic pain, leads to meaningful improvements over 6 to 12 months.
-
Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine vs PENG block (with or without dexamethasone) for hip replacement
In people aged 60 and older undergoing total hip arthroplasty, this study tests whether three anesthesia approaches provide better pain control and fewer side effects: spinal with intrathecal morphine, spinal with a PENG block, or spinal with a PENG block plus dexamethasone.
-
Intravenous dexamethasone for better pain control after hip replacement with a PENG block
This study tests whether giving dexamethasone through a vein, in 0, 4, or 8 mg doses, helps control pain after total hip arthroplasty when used with a PENG block.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.