Comparing two types of hysterectomy procedures
Official title: Vaginal Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy (VANH): a Randomised Controlled Trial
Run by Zuyderland Medisch Centrum · NCT04886791 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether a new type of vaginal hysterectomy can help women recover faster and have fewer complications compared to the traditional method.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 124 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Zuyderland Medisch Centrum Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 2 sites (Eindhoven, North Brabant and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 5, 2021 |
| Main results expected | August 1, 2025 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | August 14, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT04886791 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are women aged 18 and older who require a hysterectomy for benign indications and can undergo a vaginal hysterectomy as assessed by a qualified gynecologist.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with contraindications for vaginal hysterectomy or specific medical histories, such as endometriosis or pelvic inflammatory disease, may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to compare vaginal NOTES hysterectomy with traditional vaginal hysterectomy in terms of same-day discharge, complications, treatment outcomes, post-operative recovery, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. The study utilizes a single-blinded, multicentre, randomized controlled design to gather data from eligible women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions. The trial is motivated by the potential advantages of the vaginal NOTES approach, which may offer less pain and shorter hospital stays compared to other surgical methods.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical outcomes and recovery experiences for women undergoing hysterectomy.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have indicated potential benefits of vaginal NOTES procedures, but this specific comparison with vaginal hysterectomy is novel and has not been extensively tested.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Written and orally given informed consent * 18 years and older * Native Dutch speaker or in control of the Dutch language in speaking and writing * Indication for hysterectomy for benign indication * Possible to perform a VH judged by experienced (resident) gynaecologist during gynaecological examination Exclusion Criteria: * Any contra-indication for VH (for example, large uterus myomatosus, not enough descensus, etc) as judged by experienced gynaecologist * History of more than 1 caesarean section * History of endometriosis * History of rectal surgery * History of pelvic radiation * Suspected rectovaginal endometriosis * History of pelvic inflammatory disease, especially prior tubo-ovarian or pouch of Douglas abscess or suspected adhesions due to (ruptured) inflammatory disease (for example ruptured appendicitis) * Virginity * Pregnancy * Indication for anterior or posterior colporrhaphy during the same surgery * Indication of mid urethral slings * Uterus myomatosus will not be an exclusion criteria but the surgeon will indicate if it is possible to remove the uterus vaginally.
Where it's running
-
Zuyderland Medical Centre
Heerlen, North Brabant, Netherlands Recruiting -
Catharina Medical Centre
Eindhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Martine Wassen — Zuyderland Medical Centre
- Study coordinator: Ilse Bekkers
- Email: il.bekkers@zuyderland.nl
- Phone: 0031640970334
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Predictors of Success and Failure of v-NOTES Hysterectomy for Large Uteri
This study looks at which factors predict whether a v-NOTES hysterectomy for large uteri will be completed without needing to switch to another surgical approach.
-
Hybrid robotic surgery for gynecologic procedures using ROB platform
This study tests whether the ROB robotic platform and its endoscopic instruments can be safely used to perform laparoscopic hysterectomy with or without removal of tubes and/or ovaries in adult women.
-
Biofeedback-Assisted Pelvic Floor Training After Hysterectomy
This study tests whether biofeedback-guided pelvic floor exercises after hysterectomy can improve pelvic floor strength, reduce urinary leakage, lessen genital prolapse, and boost quality of life.
-
Effectiveness of M-TAPA nerve block for pain relief after laparoscopic hysterectomy
This study tests whether the M-TAPA nerve block before surgery can reduce opioid use and pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard pain care.
-
Reading a personal narrative book to help emotional regulation before hysterectomy in young women
This trial tests whether reading a personal narrative book in addition to usual care can help young women preparing for hysterectomy feel calmer and less anxious or depressed.
-
vNOTE Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Suspension to Support Pelvic Organs
This study tests a vaginal natural orifice surgery technique for hysterectomy that includes upfront uterosacral suspension to help prevent pelvic organ prolapse.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.