Clinical trial No longer in our active list Phase 2 Interventional Ages 50 and up

Comparing two treatments for wet age-related macular degeneration

Official title: The Sahlgrenska Anti-VEGF (SAHLVE) Study - a Prospective Randomized Double-blind Comparison of Bevacizumab and Aflibercept in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Run by Vastra Gotaland Region · NCT04101877 · Data updated 2026-05-14

This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.

This study is testing whether two different eye treatments for wet age-related macular degeneration, Avastin and Eylea, work better in the long run and if one requires fewer injections than the other.

More Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration trials

Quick facts

PhasePhase 2
Study typeInterventional
Ages50 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment402 (estimated)
SponsorVastra Gotaland Region
Government
Drugs / interventionsbevacizumab
Locations1 site (Mölndal)
Trial IDNCT04101877 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates for this study are individuals aged 50 and older diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Probably not a fit

Patients with other eye diseases affecting visual acuity, those who have previously received treatment for AMD, or those with diabetes may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study investigates the effectiveness of two different treatments for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD): intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (Avastin) and aflibercept (Eylea). It aims to determine if patients receiving bevacizumab after two years require more injections while maintaining therapy response compared to those treated with aflibercept. Additionally, the study evaluates differences in visual acuity, macular thickness, recurrence intervals, treatment durability, cost efficiency, and quality of life related to vision. The findings could provide insights into the most effective long-term treatment options for AMD.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could help identify the more effective treatment option for patients with wet age-related macular degeneration, potentially improving their vision and quality of life.

How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown varying success with similar treatment comparisons for AMD, but this specific approach is being evaluated for the first time in this context.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

Signed informed consent.

≥50 years, regardless of gender.

Diagnosed with the neovascular (wet) form of age-related macular degeneration through diagnosed neovascular vascular membranes with OCT-A and, if necessary, also FA / ICG, according to clinical routine.

Distance visual acuity ≥34 (ETDRS) on the current study eye.

Exclusion Criteria:

Other eye disease in the current study eye that affects visual acuity or the possibility of examining fundus, according to the investigator's assessment.

Previously received treatment for the neovascular (wet) form of age-related macular degeneration.

Diagnosed with diabetes (all types).

Degenerative state of the macula that prevents vision improvement such as central areolar atrophy or other pronounced dry AMD or fibrosis, in the current study eye.

Other choroidal neovascularization (CNV) of the type PCV or due to grave myopia i.e. ≥ 6.0 diopters (D) or secondary to other retinal disease, in the current study eye.

Unregulated intraocular pressure (IOP) \> 30 mmHg despite pharmacological treatment in the current study eye.

Have had a stroke or heart attack ≤6 months ago.

Inability to access information (e.g. due to dementia) or inability to conduct examinations (e.g. ETDRS examination), according to the investigator's assessment.

Inability to receive oral and written information in Swedish (in need of an interpreter).

Included in another intervention study.

Fertile woman i.e. a woman who has had menstruation for the past 12 months or has not undergone permanent sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy or bilateral oophorectomy).

Where it's running

  • Vastra Gotaland Region, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology
    Mölndal, Sweden
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.