Comparing two treatments for severe urinary symptoms in men with prostate enlargement
Official title: Non-inferiority, Randomised, Open-label Clinical Trial on the Effectiveness of Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy Compared to Prostatic Artery Embolisation in Reducing Severe Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet · NCT05686525 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether a new heat treatment or a blood vessel blocking procedure can help men with prostate enlargement feel better and improve their urinary symptoms.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 40 Years and up |
| Sex | Men only |
| Enrollment | 220 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 3 sites (Copenhagen, Copenhagen N and 2 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 27, 2022 |
| Main results expected | December 2030 |
| Study ends | December 2030 |
| Registry record updated | January 13, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT05686525 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include men over 70 with severe LUTS due to BPH who are not suitable for medical treatment or prefer not to undergo it.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with active bladder cancer, neurogenic LUTS, or those with current urinary tract infections may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The TUMT-PAE-1 trial is a randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) versus prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in alleviating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The study will assess urinary symptoms six months post-procedure using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and will also analyze patient-reported outcomes related to satisfaction and quality of life. Both treatments are less invasive alternatives to the traditional surgical option of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), which may not be suitable for all patients. The trial aims to determine if TUMT is non-inferior to PAE in managing these symptoms.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this trial could provide men with BPH a less invasive treatment option that effectively reduces urinary symptoms.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown both TUMT and PAE to be effective in reducing LUTS, but this trial aims to directly compare their effectiveness in a controlled setting.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an informed consent. * Diagnosis of LUTS secondary to BPH refractory to/contraindicated for medical treatment or not patient preference. * Severe urinary symptoms on IPSS (IPSS score ≥ 20). * Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) is defined by Qmax ≤ 15ml/sec, based on uroflowmetry. * Prostate volume at minimum 50 ml measured by TRUS or MR. * Men with prostate cancer in Active Surveillance or Watchful Waiting who have LUTS due to a large BPH component are allowed. * Indwelling catheter or intermittent catheter is allowed. In this case baseline IPSS is 35 points. Exclusion Criteria: * Active bladder cancer (patients with pTa low-grade tumors are allowed). * Previous pelvic radiation for cancer treatment. * Bladder stones (inclusion is allowed after removal). * Current urethral strictures or bladder neck contracture. * Neurogenic LUTS. * Symptomatic urinary tract infection at the time of intervention. * Documented bacterial prostatitis in the last year. * Severe atheromatous disease or other pathology preventing catheter-based intervention (as rated on CT angiography by an interventional radiologist). * Allergy to iodinated contrast media. * Renal failure defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 35ml/min. * High bleeding risk (spontaneous international normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.6). * Contraindication to conscious sedation (if requested by the patient). * Prostate median lobe defined by treating physician. * Urethral colliculus to bladder neck length \<35mm.
Where it's running
-
Urological Research Unit, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark Recruiting -
Department of Urology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital
Gentofte Municipality, Hellerup, Denmark Recruiting -
Zealand University Hospital
Roskilde, Denmark Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Anna Kristensen-Alvarez, MD
- Email: anna.kristensen-alvarez@regionh.dk
- Phone: +4535456152
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Tamsulosin alone vs. tamsulosin with tadalafil for troublesome urinary symptoms from enlarged prostate
This study tests whether adding tadalafil to tamsulosin helps men with BPH see better urinary symptoms and quality of life, using two tadalafil doses over 12 weeks.
-
Water Vapor Therapy vs Ejaculation-Sparing Enucleation for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
This study tests whether Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (Rezum) or an ejaculation-sparing enucleation procedure better helps sexually active men with bothersome BPH symptoms.
-
Water Vapor Therapy versus Ejaculation-Preserving HoLEP for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
This study compares Rezum water vapor therapy to ejaculation-preserving HoLEP in sexually active men with moderate-to-severe symptoms from BPH to see which preserves ejaculation better while easing urinary symptoms.
-
Ejaculation-Preserving Bipolar Prostate Enucleation for BPH
This randomized trial tests whether a modified ejaculation-preserving bipolar TUEP can maintain ejaculation while still relieving urinary symptoms in sexually active men with BPH who didn’t improve with meds.
-
Melatonin and Solifenacin for stent-related symptoms after ureteroscopy
This study tests whether solifenacin, melatonin, or both can reduce stent-related urinary symptoms and improve sleep after ureteroscopic stone treatment.
-
Urine, perineal, and stool microbiota in children and adolescents
We will test whether the bacteria in voided urine, around the genitals, and in stool differ between children with overactive bladder or daytime wetting and healthy children of the same age and gender.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.