Comparing two surgical methods for fixing acetabular fractures
Official title: A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Rim Plate to Buttress Plate for Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures With and Without Inter-fragmentary Screws
Run by University of Cincinnati · NCT06409559 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing two different surgical methods for fixing hip fractures to see which one helps patients heal better and reduces complications.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Cincinnati Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Cincinnati, Ohio) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 1, 2023 |
| Main results expected | March 2027 |
| Study ends | March 2028 |
| Registry record updated | May 4, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06409559 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are skeletally mature individuals aged 18 to 65 with acute posterior wall acetabular fractures due to hip dislocation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with severe osteoarthritis, metabolic bone diseases, or those unsuitable for internal fixation will not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial investigates two surgical techniques for fixing posterior wall acetabular fractures: the Rim Plate method with interfragmentary screws and the Buttress Plate method without screws. The study aims to determine which method provides better fixation, reduces the risk of fracture displacement, promotes better healing of the joint surface, and minimizes early post-traumatic arthritis. A total of 60 skeletally mature patients with acute traumatic fractures will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. The outcomes will be assessed to evaluate the effectiveness of each surgical approach.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical outcomes and functional recovery for patients with acetabular fractures.
How similar studies have gone: While similar surgical techniques have been explored, this specific comparison of the Rim Plate and Buttress Plate methods is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Skeletally mature males and females, ≥ 18 years old and with age less than 65 years. 2. Fracture of the acetabular posterior wall fracture due to acute traumatic hip dislocation, confirmed with anteroposterior pelvic or hip radiographs, and CT scan 3. Operative fixation of fractures within 14 days of presenting to the emergency room. 4. Patient was ambulatory prior to fracture, with or without walking aids 5. Medically optimized for operative intervention 6. Provision of informed consent by patient or legal guardian. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients not suitable for internal fixation (severe osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or pathologic fracture). 2. Pre-existing orthopedic fixation, implant, or prosthesis around the affected acetabulum. 3. Patients with metabolic bone disease including diagnosis of osteoporosis. 4. Patients with bony or soft tissue infections around the acetabulum. 5. Patients unable to provide informed consent. 6. Patients having other fractures of Pelvis or acetabulum other than an isolated posterior acetabular wall fracture. 7. Patients with previous history of acetabular fracture (operative or nonoperative) 8. Patients with previous history of hip pathology such as avascular necrosis, hip dysplasia, Legg-Calve Perthes Disease, or advanced degenerative arthritis.
Where it's running
-
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Kimberly A Hasselfeld
- Email: hasselky@uc.edu
- Phone: 5135581933
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Observing recovery in patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures
This study looks at how different treatments for pelvic and acetabular fractures affect recovery and quality of life for patients over time.
-
Fixing the hip socket with plates and screws versus adding a hip replacement for older adults with a broken acetabulum
This study will try two surgical approaches—ORIF alone versus ORIF plus a primary total hip replacement—in people 60 and older with an acute displaced acetabular (hip socket) fracture to see which gives better pain, function, and quality of life.
-
Using nerve monitoring to help protect nerves during breast cancer lymph node surgery
This study tests whether intraoperative nerve monitoring and bipolar electrocautery during axillary lymph node dissection can help identify and preserve nerves to reduce post-surgical neuropathic pain.
-
Lowering nodal and primary tumor radiation dose in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer
This phase II study tests whether reducing radiation doses to regions without visible cancer, while keeping the main tumor dose the same, can treat HPV-positive OPSCC with fewer side effects.
-
Measuring the mechanical cost of walking in people with stroke-related walking problems
It tests a new biomechanical way to measure how much energy walking uses in people with walking problems after stroke.
-
Combining N-acetylcysteine and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy to target prefrontal glutamate in mildly depressed youth
This trial will test whether taking N-acetylcysteine (NAC) together with mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) helps mildly depressed teens and young adults by changing prefrontal glutamate levels and brain connectivity.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.