Comparing two rod techniques for spinal fusion surgery
Official title: Durability of Supplementary Rod Constructs-SuppleMentAry Rod Technique (SMART)-for Long-segment Posterior Instrumented Spinal Fusion Procedures: A Multicenter Retrospective Comparative Study With Dual-rod Constructs
Run by AO Foundation, AO Spine · NCT06368245 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether using a different type of rod in spinal fusion surgery can help prevent problems after the operation for people who have had back surgery.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 45 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 1244 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | AO Foundation, AO Spine Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 17 sites (Redwood City, California and 16 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 24, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 15, 2027 |
| Study ends | July 31, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | October 1, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06368245 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are patients aged 45 years and older who have received long-segment posterior thoracolumbar instrumented fusion using either supplementary or dual-rod constructs.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who have not undergone long-segment posterior thoracolumbar instrumented fusion or are younger than 45 years may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This multicenter retrospective comparative cohort study evaluates the outcomes of long-segment posterior thoracolumbar instrumented fusion surgeries using either supplementary rod constructs or dual-rod constructs. It aims to enroll 1244 patients who have undergone either primary or revision surgeries, analyzing their medical records to assess the effectiveness of the supplementary rod constructs in reducing risks of mechanical complications. The study will provide long-term clinical evidence on the benefits of these constructs in spinal fusion procedures.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical outcomes and reduced complications for patients undergoing spinal fusion.
How similar studies have gone: While this study is exploring a specific comparative approach, similar studies have shown promise in evaluating different surgical techniques in spinal fusion.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 45 years and older. * Patients receiving long-segment posterior TL instrumented fusion using either supplementary rod constructs or dual-rod constructs (the index surgery). * Long-segment is defined as the UIV at a thoracic level and the LIV at the sacrum/ilium. * Supplementary rod constructs are defined as: in addition to the traditional two primary rods, at least one supplementary rod (eg, accessory rods or satellite rods) is used, and at least one supplementary rod and one primary rod (ie, at least two rods) together must span multiple (≥ 2) vertebral levels. The supplementary rod constructs do not include rods connected end-to-end or side-to-side that do not bridge multiple vertebral levels. * The index surgery can be a primary surgery or a revision surgery. * The index surgery, staged or non-staged, must use posterior spinal fusion but can be in combination with other approaches such as an anterior procedure. * If the index surgery is a revision surgery, the primary rods must be replaced in the revision surgery, with the exception of Harrington or Luque rods which can remain in place. o If the Harrington or Luque rods remain in situ, they must already have the UIV at the thoracic level and the LIV at the sacrum/ilium, or an extension of the existing Harrington or Luque is performed such that the UIV is at the thoracic level and the LIV at the sacrum/ilium. * The index surgery was performed between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020, inclusive. * Minimum 3 months of FU after the index surgery. * Ability to provide informed consent according to the IRB/EC defined and approved procedures if applicable for retrospective data analysis. Exclusion Criteria: * Spinal fusion performed for acute trauma (ie, ≤ 1 year of trauma). * Spinal fusion performed for tumor. * Spinal fusion performed for infection. * Patients with Parkinson's Disease. * Patients with neuromuscular disorders. * Patients with spine malignancies requiring chemo- or radiation therapy.
Where it's running
-
Stanford Spine Clinic
Redwood City, California, United States Recruiting -
University of California
Sacramento, California, United States Recruiting -
John Hopkis Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States Recruiting -
University of Minnesota Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States Recruiting -
Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States Recruiting -
Columbia University / NYP Och Spine Hospital
New York, New York, United States Recruiting
Show 11 more locations
-
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States Recruiting -
University of Calgary Spine
Calgary, Canada Recruiting -
University of Toronto
Toronto, Canada Recruiting -
Kothari Medical Centre
Kolkata, India Recruiting -
University of Tokyo
Tokyo, Japan Recruiting -
Hospital Vall d´Hebron
Barcelona, Spain Recruiting -
Acibadem Maslak Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting -
UCSF Spine Center
San Francisco, California, United States Terminated -
Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110
St Louis, Missouri, United States Completed -
Duchess of Kent Children's Hospital
Hong Kong, China Completed -
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
Hamamatsu, Japan Completed
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Justin S Smith, MD, PhD — Professor of Neurosurgery Chief of Spine Division, Fellowship Director University of Virginia
- Study coordinator: Alix Frischknecht
- Email: alix.frischknecht@aofoundation.org
- Phone: +41 79 606 41 48
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Blood Transfusion Factors and Cell Saver Use in Kids’ Spine Surgery
This study looks at which factors put pediatric scoliosis patients at risk for needing donor blood during posterior spinal fusion and how using a Cell Saver during surgery might reduce that need.
-
Ear (auricular) vagus nerve stimulation to lower inflammation after long spinal fusion
This trial will test whether non-invasive ear-based vagus nerve stimulation can lower inflammation, improve blood sugar control, and reduce pain after long-segment spinal fusion surgery.
-
Preoperative IV iron for teens having spinal fusion to correct scoliosis
This trial will try giving a single IV iron infusion before spinal fusion to see if it helps 10–19-year-olds with scoliosis and low iron by reducing blood transfusions and improving recovery.
-
Evaluation of 3D Digital Surgery in Traumatology
This study is testing if using 3D digital surgery tools can help patients with orthopedic conditions have better surgery outcomes and fewer complications compared to traditional methods.
-
Liposomal bupivacaine versus standard bupivacaine with epinephrine for pain after adolescent spinal fusion
This trial tests whether injecting liposomal bupivacaine instead of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine during posterior spinal fusion reduces opioid use after surgery in adolescents aged 10 to 17 with idiopathic scoliosis.
-
Using Aprepitant to Prevent Nausea in Children After Scoliosis Surgery
This study tests if a medication called Aprepitant can help reduce nausea and vomiting in children after they have surgery for scoliosis.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.