Comparing two pacing methods for treating slow heart rates
Official title: Physiological vs Right Ventricular Pacing Outcome Trial Evaluated for bradyCardia Treatment
Run by Imperial College London · NCT05815745 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing two different ways to help people with slow heart rates feel better by comparing traditional pacing to a newer method in 2600 patients.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 2600 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Imperial College London Academic / other |
| Locations | 45 sites (Dublin and 44 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 5, 2023 |
| Main results expected | June 4, 2031 |
| Study ends | June 4, 2031 |
| Registry record updated | July 22, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT05815745 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults over 18 with specific pacing indications and a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35%.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who only require occasional ventricular pacing or have a life expectancy of less than one year may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The PROTECT-HF trial is a multi-centre randomized controlled trial designed to compare two different pacing approaches for patients with bradycardia. It will evaluate the traditional right ventricular pacing against a newer physiological pacing method, which includes His and Left bundle area pacing, in a cohort of 2600 patients. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two pacing methods, and their outcomes will be assessed at baseline and every six months thereafter. The study aims to provide insights into the effectiveness of these pacing strategies in improving patient outcomes.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved pacing strategies that enhance heart function and quality of life for patients with bradycardia.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have explored various pacing methods, but this specific comparison of physiological pacing versus right ventricular pacing is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
We will recruit patients who are referred for clinically indicated pacemaker implantation Inclusion Criteria: 1\. Adults aged over 18 with left ventricular ejection fraction \>35% and one or more of the following guideline based ventricular pacing indications: 1. Permanent or intermittent 3rd degree AV block 2. Permanent or intermittent Mobitz type II AV block 3. First Degree AV block with a pacing indication 4. Slow chronic Atrial Fibrillation or Proposed AV node ablation 5. Bifascicular block with a pacing indication 6. Trifascicular block with a pacing indication 7. Wenckebach with a pacing indication Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients who are likely to only need occasional ventricular pacing, i.e. those with isolated sick sinus syndrome. 2. Pregnant women. 3. Unable to provide informed consent. 4. Those with comorbidity leading to a life expectancy \<1year.
Where it's running
-
Beacon Hospital
Dublin, Ireland Recruiting -
Univerisity Medical Centre Ljubljana
Ljubljana, Slovenia Recruiting -
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Aberdeen, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Queen's Hospital
Barking, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Good Hope Hospital
Birmingham, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Birmingham, United Kingdom Recruiting
Show 39 more locations
-
University Hospital Dorset
Bournemouth, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Royal SUSSEX County Hospital
Brighton, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Bristol Heart Institute
Bristol, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Royal Papworth Hospital
Cambridge, United Kingdom Recruiting -
St Richard's Hospital
Chichester, United Kingdom Recruiting -
University Hospital Coventry
Coventry, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Croydon
Croydon, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Victoria Hospital
Fife Keith, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Medway Maritime Hospital
Gillingham, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Wycombe Hospital
High Wycombe, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Forth Valley Royal Hospital
Larbert, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Leeds Teaching Hospital
Leeds, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Glenfield Hospital
Leicester, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital
Liverpool, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Hammersmith Hospital
London, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Kettering Hospital
London, United Kingdom Recruiting -
King's College Hospital
London, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Royal Free London/ Barnet Hospital
London, United Kingdom Recruiting -
St Bartholomew's Hospital
London, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Watford General Hospital
London, United Kingdom Recruiting -
James Cook Hospital
Middlesbrough, United Kingdom Recruiting -
King's Mill Hospital
Nottingham, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Nottingham City Hospital
Nottingham, United Kingdom Recruiting -
John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Portsmouth, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Royal Berkshire
Reading, United Kingdom Recruiting -
East Surrey
Redhill, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Rotherham General Hospital
Rotherham, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Northern General
Sheffield, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Wexham Park Hospital
Slough, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Southampton
Southampton, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Morriston Hospital
Swansea, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Great Western
Swindon, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Musgrove Park Hospital
Taunton, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Torbay Hospital
Torquay, United Kingdom Recruiting -
UHS Worthing
Worthing, United Kingdom Recruiting -
York Hospital
York, United Kingdom Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Zachary Whinnett
- Email: z.whinnett@imperial.ac.uk
- Phone: +447749576830
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Left bundle branch area pacing with Tendril STS or UltiPace leads
This study will try left bundle branch area pacing with the Tendril STS or UltiPace lead in adults who need pacemaker leads for bradycardia or related heart conditions to see if pacing and sensing are safe and work through six months after implant.
-
LINEA pacing lead for septal placement in pacemaker patients
This study tests the safety and performance of a new LINEA cardiac pacing lead for patients getting a new pacemaker with septal placement.
-
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs Right Ventricular Pacing for Atrial Fibrillation Risk in AV Block
This study tests whether left bundle branch area pacing can lower the chance of developing atrial fibrillation compared with traditional right ventricular pacing in adults with AV block.
-
SPIKE FLOW endocardial pacing lead safety and performance study
This study tests whether the SPIKE FLOW temporary endocardial pacing lead is safe and effective in adults needing temporary pacing during heart-related conditions.
-
Factors Linked to Slow Heart Rate After Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
This study looks for factors that might cause bradycardia during the hospital stay after AF ablation using pulsed field technology.
-
Transjugular implantation of a leadless pacemaker (Aveir VR) for ventricular pacing
This study tests whether placing an Aveir VR leadless pacemaker through the neck vein can safely provide ventricular pacing in adults with bradycardia.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.