Clinical trial No longer in our active list Interventional Ages 18 and up

Comparing two methods to prevent infections after emergency surgery for peritonitis

Official title: Emergency Laparotomy for Peritonitis and Surgical Site Infection: Preventive Subcutaneous NPWT vs Primary Closure - a Randomized Health Services Study

Run by Medical University of Gdansk · NCT05684198 · Data updated 2026-05-14

This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.

This study is testing whether a special type of wound treatment or regular closure after emergency surgery for peritonitis can better prevent infections in patients.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment150 (estimated)
SponsorMedical University of Gdansk
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Gdańsk, Pomerania)
Trial IDNCT05684198 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are patients who are scheduled for an emergency laparotomy due to peritonitis and can provide informed consent.

Probably not a fit

Patients who are qualified for open abdomen treatment will not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study evaluates the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) versus primary closure (PC) in preventing surgical site infections (SSI) in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for peritonitis. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either NPWT or PC after their surgery, and both groups will be monitored for one year postoperatively. The study also includes a cost analysis to assess the feasibility of implementing NPWT as a routine preventive measure in similar surgical cases. The goal is to determine which method is more effective in reducing the incidence of SSI and improving patient outcomes.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could significantly reduce the rate of surgical site infections, leading to shorter hospital stays and improved recovery for patients.

How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown promising results for NPWT in reducing surgical site infections, suggesting that this approach may be effective.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* qualified for an emergency laparotomy for peritonitis
* gave written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* qualified for open abdomen treatment

Where it's running

  • UCC Division of Oncological, Transplant and General Surgery
    Gdańsk, Pomerania, Poland
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: Piotr Spychalski, MD PhD — MUG Division of General Surgery
  • Study coordinator: Katarzyna M Polomska
  • Email: k.polomska@gumed.edu.pl
  • Phone: +48794037928

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.