Comparing two methods of placing the humeral component in shoulder replacement surgery
Official title: Onlay Versus Inlay Humeral Component in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: a Prospective, Randomized Trial
Run by William Beaumont Hospitals · NCT05297305 · Data updated 2026-05-14
This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.
This study is testing whether placing a shoulder replacement component inside or on top of the bone affects how well people can move their shoulder and manage pain two years after surgery.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 154 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | William Beaumont Hospitals Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Royal Oak, Michigan) |
| Trial ID | NCT05297305 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older with specific shoulder conditions such as cuff tear arthropathy or primary osteoarthritis requiring reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who have had prior shoulder surgeries, are undergoing revision arthroplasty, or have certain diagnoses like rheumatoid arthritis or acute trauma may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study compares the effects of two different placements of the humeral component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the inlay method, where the component sits inside the bone, and the onlay method, where it sits on top of the bone. The goal is to determine if these different placements affect shoulder function, including range of motion and pain levels, two years after surgery. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups and will undergo evaluations at baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery to assess their outcomes.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved shoulder function and pain relief for patients undergoing shoulder replacement surgery.
How similar studies have gone: While similar studies have explored various surgical techniques in shoulder arthroplasty, this specific comparison of inlay versus onlay humeral component placement is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients undergoing primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the following components: 1. Onlay group: Ascend Flex stem, Perform Reversed standard +3 lateralized 25mm baseplate with standard 36 mm glenosphere or +6 lateralized 25mm baseplate with 39mm glenosphere 2. Inlay group: Perform Stem Reverse, Perform Reversed +3 lateralized 25mm baseplate with standard 36mm glenosphere or +6 lateralized 25mm baseplate with 39mm glenosphere * Diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tear, or primary osteoarthritis with cuff tear * Negative external rotation lag sign, ability to externally rotate beyond neutral * Age 18 years or older Exclusion Criteria: * Revision arthroplasty * Prior open shoulder surgery * Concomitant tendon transfer (Latissimus Dorsi, Pectoralis Tendon, Lower Trapezius) * Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, infection, acute trauma or instability * Patients not willing to undergo a standardized physical therapy protocol or home therapy program after surgical intervention * Patient anatomy does not accommodate the study implants per surgeon discretion * Pregnant, patient-reported * Minors (under 18 years of age) * Cognitively impaired based on a diagnosis of dementia, psychiatric disorder, or any cognitive deficit that will not allow for proper informed consent or answering of study questionnaires
Where it's running
-
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Alex Martusiewicz, MD — Beaumont Health
- Study coordinator: Grace SanAgustin, BSN
- Email: Grace.SanAgustin@beaumont.org
- Phone: 248-551-6679
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Rotator cuff repair with biceps rerouting and dermal graft augmentation for large, difficult tears
This study tests a combined surgical approach to see if it helps tendon retear rates in adults with large rotator cuff tears that are hard to repair.
-
Muscle Thickness, Trunk Proprioception, and Postural Stability in Rotator Cuff Pathology
This study tests whether trunk and abdominal muscle thickness and sense of position relate to shoulder problems from rotator cuff issues, by comparing people with rotator cuff pathology to healthy controls.
-
Single-shot nerve block with IV dexamethasone for rebound pain after shoulder surgery
This trial tests whether giving a one-time shoulder nerve block plus an IV dexamethasone dose can prevent rebound pain after shoulder surgery.
-
Two anesthesia methods to keep the joint clear during shoulder arthroscopy
This trial tests whether inhaled sevoflurane vs. total intravenous anesthesia with propofol affects how well surgeons can see inside the shoulder during rotator cuff repair.
-
Concentric vs Eccentric Full Can Exercise for Partial Rotator Cuff Tears
This study tests whether concentric or eccentric full can exercises are more effective for improving shoulder pain and muscle structure in people with partial rotator cuff tears.
-
Tracking recovery after arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgeries
This will follow people having routine arthroscopic shoulder or knee surgery to see if patient characteristics, tear details, or surgical choices predict better recovery and function over two years.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.