Comparing two methods for heart artery treatment in patients with coronary disease
Official title: ASSIST Trial Anatomic Versus Physiologic Guidance for Complete Revascularization With Drug Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
Run by Asan Medical Center · NCT05529459 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing which method of guiding heart artery treatment works better for patients with coronary artery disease by comparing two different approaches during their procedures.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 19 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 2400 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Asan Medical Center Academic / other |
| Locations | 17 sites (Anyang and 16 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 13, 2023 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | July 31, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | January 10, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT05529459 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are men and women aged 19 and older with significant coronary artery lesions suitable for percutaneous coronary intervention.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with chronic total occlusions or those who have had previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study compares the clinical outcomes of two different guidance methods for complete revascularization in patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. It is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial where patients will be assigned to either quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)-guided or fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided strategies. Eligible patients will have significant stenotic lesions and will be monitored for outcomes based on the chosen intervention method. The study aims to determine which guidance method leads to better clinical results.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve treatment outcomes for patients with coronary artery disease by identifying the most effective revascularization strategy.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored similar approaches in coronary interventions, but this specific comparison of QCA versus FFR guidance is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Men or women between the ages of 19and older * Typical chest pain or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia suitable for PCI Significant lesions with a diameter stenosis of 50-90% in major epicardial coronary arteries ≥ 2.25 mm in diameter by visual estimation. * The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site. Exclusion Criteria: * Coronary lesions resulting in the expected inability to perform FFR (ex, severe tortuosity or extreme angulation of the vessels) * Chronic total occlusion * Failed PCI of severe stenotic (diameter stenosis \> 90%) or ACS culprit lesions * Previous PCI within 6 months before the index procedure * Previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery * Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic instability * Left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction \< 35%) * Life expectancy \< 1 years for any non-cardiac or cardiac causes * Any surgery requiring general anesthesia or discontinuation of aspirin and/or an ADP antagonist is planned within 12 months after the procedure * A diagnosis of cancer (other than superficial squamous or basal cell skin cancer) in the past 3 years or current treatment for the active cancer * Patient's pregnant or breast-feeding or child-bearing potential. * A known intolerance to antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor) * Hypersensitivity or contraindication to DES material and its degradants and cobalt, chromium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, acrylic and fluoro polymers that cannot be adequately pre-medicated * Any clinically significant abnormality identified at the screening visit, physical examination, laboratory tests, or electrocardiogram which, in the judgment of the investigator, would preclude safe completion of the study * Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol
Where it's running
-
Inje University Busan Paik Hospital
Busan, South Korea Recruiting -
Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital
Changwon, South Korea Recruiting -
Chungbuk National University Hospital
Cheongju-si, South Korea Recruiting -
Daegu Veterans Hospital
Daegu, South Korea Recruiting -
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Daegu, South Korea Recruiting -
Gangneung Asan Hospital
Gangneung, South Korea Recruiting
Show 11 more locations
-
Wonkwang University Hospital
Iksan, South Korea Recruiting -
Kwangju Christian Hospital
Kwangju, South Korea Recruiting -
Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital
Pusan, South Korea Recruiting -
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea Recruiting -
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul, South Korea Recruiting -
Veterans Hospital Service Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea Recruiting -
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
Anyang, South Korea Not yet recruiting -
Bucheon Sejong Hospital
Bucheon-si, South Korea Not yet recruiting -
Bundang CHA Hospital
Seongnam, South Korea Not yet recruiting -
The Catholic University of Korea, ST. Vincent's Hospital
Suwon, South Korea Not yet recruiting -
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Yangsan, South Korea Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Seung-Whan Lee, Investigator — Asan Medical Center
- Study coordinator: Jiwon Baek, RN
- Email: cvcrc22@amc.seoul.kr
- Phone: 82230107267
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Tailored digital support to cut sedentary time in long-term cardiac rehab
In adults in a long-term cardiac rehabilitation program, this study tests whether a personalized behavioural program with digital tools can reduce daily sitting time.
-
Predicting how coronary artery disease progresses in adults 45 and younger
This project will try to build prediction models using coronary CT scans and health data from people aged 18–45 to see who is more likely to have plaque get worse over time.
-
Freesolve resorbable magnesium scaffold vs. Xience stent for up to two new heart artery lesions
This trial tests whether the Freesolve resorbable magnesium scaffold works as well as the Xience drug-eluting stent for treating up to two new coronary artery lesions in adults.
-
Italian Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry for Coronary Disease and Heart Failure
This registry collects real-world information to see how cardiac rehabilitation programs work for adults recovering from coronary disease or heart failure across Italy.
-
Orbital atherectomy versus standard balloon strategy for calcified coronary bifurcation lesions
This study tests whether using orbital atherectomy before stenting helps adults with moderately or severely calcified coronary bifurcation lesions get better stent results than the standard balloon-first approach.
-
Healthy Nordic diet's effects on heart disease
This study is testing if following a Healthy Nordic diet can help people with coronary heart disease improve their heart health over 18 months.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.