Comparing two methods for catheter ablation of atrial flutter
Official title: A Zero Fluoroscopy Maximum Voltage Guided Stepwise Approach Using IntellaMiFi Technology Compared to Linear Ablation of the Cavotricuspid Isthmus for Typical Atrial Flutter: the ZERO MAGIC Trial
Run by Klinikum-Fuerth · NCT04678258 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether a new way of doing catheter ablation for atrial flutter can be safer and more effective than the standard method.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 106 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Klinikum-Fuerth Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Fürth, Bavaria) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 30, 2020 |
| Main results expected | August 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | August 31, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | June 15, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT04678258 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults over 18 years old with documented typical atrial flutter who are eligible for curative CTI ablation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with contraindications for CTI ablation, previous CTI ablation, or those with certain medical devices like pacemakers may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial compares two approaches for catheter ablation of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) in patients with typical atrial flutter. One method is the conventional linear ablation, while the other is a maximum voltage-guided (MVG) technique that targets high voltage areas to potentially reduce ablation duration and radiation exposure. The study aims to provide robust evidence on the efficacy and safety of the MVG approach compared to the standard method. Participants will undergo detailed mapping and signal analysis to identify the best treatment strategy.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to a safer and more efficient treatment for patients with atrial flutter, reducing radiation exposure and procedural time.
How similar studies have gone: While there is growing evidence supporting the MVG approach, this study aims to provide the first properly powered prospective randomized trial to validate its efficacy compared to conventional methods.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Typical (CTI dependent) atrial flutter documented in a standard 12 lead surface ECG * Given class I indication for curative CTI ablation according to the current guidelines * Over 18 years old * Given informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Any contraindication for CTI ablation * Previous CTI ablation * BCB as procedural endpoint not assessable * CTI ablation conducted in association with further ablation procedures * Patients with CIED (e.g. pacemaker, ICD) * Tricuspid valve replacement * Right atrial thrombus * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Abuse of drugs or alcohol * Age \< 18 years * Incompliance to the treatment, e.g. necessary anticoagulation * Expected survival less than one year * Inability to understand the nature and rationale of the study * Inability to take part in the follow up
Where it's running
-
Klinikum Fuerth
Fürth, Bavaria, Germany Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Dirk Bastian, MD — Klinikum-Fuerth
- Study coordinator: Dirk Bastian, MD
- Email: dirk.bastian@klinikum-fuerth.de
- Phone: 7580 1101
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Non-invasive mapping to help treat ventricular tachycardia due to heart disease
This study tests a non-invasive mapping tool to guide VT ablation in adults with structural heart disease and prior heart attack.
-
Next-Gen Fluoroscopy System vs Conventional System in Endoscopy
This trial tests whether a next-generation fluoroscopy system lowers radiation exposure for patients and staff during fluoroscopy-guided endoscopic procedures.
-
Operator radiation dose during PCI: left distal radial access vs right conventional radial access
This study tests whether using the left distal radial approach during PCI leads to different radiation exposure for the operator compared with the standard right radial approach in adult patients.
-
Catheter ablation plus LAAC vs anticoagulation in frail elderly A-fib patients
This study tests whether adding left atrial appendage closure to ablation is as good as using long-term blood thinners in frail people aged 75 and up with atrial fibrillation.
-
Substrate remodelling and targeted ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation
This project will try using detailed 3D electrical mapping of the left atrium to guide targeted ablation (pulmonary vein reisolation, ganglionic plexi, and substrate ablation) for people with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing their first catheter ablation.
-
Skipping the clinical target volume (CTV) around the primary tumor in limited-stage small cell lung cancer
This trial tests whether giving chest radiotherapy that skips the usual extra margin around the main tumor is as effective and causes fewer side effects for people with limited-stage small cell lung cancer who have responded to initial chemotherapy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.