Clinical trial No longer in our active list Interventional Ages 18 to 99

Comparing two biopsy methods for diagnosing sarcoidosis in lymph nodes

Official title: Evaluating the Diagnostic Yield and Specimen Quality With Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Intranodal Forceps Biopsies in Patients With Mediastinal and Hilar Lymphadenopathy: A Prospective Analysis

Run by George Washington University · NCT05374447 · Data updated 2026-05-14

This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.

This study is testing whether a new biopsy method can find sarcoidosis in lymph nodes better than the standard method for people who might have this condition.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 99 Years
SexAll
Enrollment55 (estimated)
SponsorGeorge Washington University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Washington, District of Columbia)
Trial IDNCT05374447 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older with radiologic evidence of mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy and a possible diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

Probably not a fit

Patients with previously diagnosed sarcoidosis or those who are high risk for general anesthesia may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study aims to compare the diagnostic yield and specimen quality of endobronchial ultrasound-guided intranodal forceps biopsy (EBUS-IFB) with the standard transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in patients suspected of having sarcoidosis based on imaging. It is a prospective, single-center randomized study that will enroll 55 patients to assess whether EBUS-IFB provides a higher diagnostic yield than EBUS-TBNA. The study seeks to fill a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of these biopsy techniques in diagnosing mediastinal lymphadenopathy. The results could help refine diagnostic approaches for suspected sarcoidosis.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve the accuracy of diagnosing sarcoidosis, leading to better patient management.

How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown promising results with similar biopsy techniques, indicating potential for success in this approach.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Radiologic evidence of mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy
* Attending radiologist or pulmonologist reports a possible diagnosis of sarcoidosis
* Age 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria\*:

These are the characteristics that a participant must NOT have in order to be eligible to participate in the study.

Order Number Criteria

* Severe pulmonary hypertension
* Inability to undergo general anesthesia
* Severe coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis
* Previously diagnosed sarcoidosis
* Patient presently taking clopidogrel
* Patient deemed to be high risk for general anesthesia per anesthesiologist
* Hemodynamic instability
* Mediastinitis
* Acute Hypercarbic Respiratory Failure (pCO2 \>55mmHg)

Where it's running

  • The George Washington University Hospital
    Washington, District of Columbia, United States
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.