Comparing two airway devices for minor urological procedures under general anesthesia
Official title: Laryngeal Mask Airway I-Gel and Laryngeal Mask Airway Protector for Minor Urological Procedures Under General Anesthesia in Adult Patients: A Randomized Comparative Study
Run by Sismanoglio General Hospital · NCT06825910 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing which of two airway devices, the iGel or the Protector, works better and safer for adults undergoing minor urological procedures with general anesthesia.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 90 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 100 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Sismanoglio General Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Athens and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 30, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 30, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | April 27, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06825910 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adult patients aged 18 and older with ASA I-II status undergoing minor urological procedures.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with anatomical anomalies of the upper airway or a history of difficult intubation may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized comparative study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of two laryngeal mask airway devices, the iGel and the Protector, during minor urological procedures in adult patients under general anesthesia. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the iGel or the Protector device. The study aims to assess not only the performance of these devices but also any unwanted effects that may arise during the procedures. By comparing these two devices, the study seeks to determine which one provides better airway management in this specific surgical context.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could enhance airway management techniques during minor urological procedures, leading to improved patient safety and outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown varying success with similar airway device comparisons, but this specific comparison is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * ASA I-II * Patients older than 18 years * Procedures in supine and lithotomy position Exclusion Criteria: * Tumors or anatomical anomalies of the upper airway * Known history of difficult intubation * Limited mouth opening less than 2cm * Decreased compliance of the lungs or the thoracic cage * Need of mechanical ventilation after the surgery
Where it's running
-
SismanoglioGH
Athens, Greece Recruiting -
SismanoglioGH
Athens, Greece Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Maria Zozefin Nikolopoulou
- Email: mz.nikolopoulou@gmail.com
- Phone: +306987389354
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh blades for obstetric intubation
This study tests whether a hyperangulated blade or a Macintosh-style blade helps obstetric patients get an endotracheal tube placement more safely during cesarean deliveries under general anesthesia.
-
Validate the MASCAN score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation
This study will see if the MASCAN score can predict difficult facemask ventilation in adults having general anesthesia and whether factors like timing of muscle relaxants, manual versus controlled ventilation, and capnography readings change its accuracy.
-
Frontal EEG Changes During Anesthesia in People With Obesity vs. Normal Weight
This study tests whether frontal brain activity patterns during anesthesia differ between adults with obesity and those of normal weight.
-
Ultrasound Measurements and Age-Related Anatomy to Guide LMA Placement
This study tests whether ultrasound measurements of the upper airway and age-related anatomy affect how easily and accurately a laryngeal mask is placed in young adults and older adults.
-
AI-assisted ultrasound check for LMA placement in adults
A prospective study tests if artificial intelligence using ultrasound images can determine whether a laryngeal mask airway is placed correctly in adults having surgery.
-
Remimazolam versus Midazolam for anesthesia induction in older adults
This observational study compares remimazolam and midazolam when inducing anesthesia in people aged 65 and older undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery to see which provides better stability and safety.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.