Comparing three specialist pacemakers to improve heart pumping and reduce rhythm problems

Randomised Investigation of Physiological, Conventional and Optimised Resynchronisation Therapy in Heart Failure With Prolonged QRS Duration (RIPCORD-CRT)

Not applicable Interventional Imperial College London · NCT07430553

This study will test three types of specialist pacemakers in people with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction to see which best improves symptoms and heart rhythms over six months.

Quick facts

PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment60 (estimated)
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
SponsorImperial College London Academic / other
Locations1 site (London, Greater London)
Trial IDNCT07430553 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

The trial enrolls patients referred for cardiac resynchronisation therapy who have symptomatic heart failure, reduced LVEF, and electrical dyssynchrony. Participants will receive a CRT device implanted using one of three pacing methods—biventricular pacing (BVP), conduction system pacing (CSP), or left-bundle optimised CRT (LOT-CRT)—and attend four hospital visits over six months. Symptoms will be recorded daily via a smartphone app and investigators will collect clinical, electrical, and imaging measures to compare effects on heart function and rhythm events. Outcomes at six months will be compared across the three pacing strategies to determine differences in symptom relief, arrhythmia rates, and cardiac performance.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Ideal candidates are adults with symptomatic heart failure (NYHA II–IV), reduced LVEF ≤40%, prolonged QRS with left bundle branch block or very prolonged QRS, who are referred for a CRT implant or upgrade and are on optimal medical therapy.

Not a fit: Patients without electrical dyssynchrony or with LVEF above 40%, as well as those who cannot consent, are pregnant, under 18, or unable to attend the required hospital visits, are unlikely to benefit from or be eligible for this study.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the results could help clinicians choose the pacing method that most improves heart function, reduces rhythm problems, and eases symptoms for people with heart failure.

How similar studies have performed: Conventional biventricular CRT is an established therapy, while conduction system pacing and LOT-CRT are newer approaches with encouraging early results but limited large-scale outcome data.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

Patients referred/scheduled for a CRT procedure (new implant or upgrade) who have:

* Symptomatic heart failure (NYHA II-IV)
* Reduced ejection fraction (LVEF≤40%)
* Prolonged QRS duration (≥130ms) and left bundle branch block ECG morphology or very prolonged QRS duration (\>150ms) and non-left bundle branch block ECG
* Optimal medical therapy for HF

Exclusion Criteria:

* Unable to provide informed consent
* \<18 years old
* Pregnant patients (with female patients of childbearing age requiring a negative urine BHCG)

Where this trial is running

London, Greater London

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection FractionDyssynchronyCardiac resynchronisation therapyConduction system pacingoptimised CRTLOT-CRTheart failuredyssynchrony
Last reviewed 2026-06-13 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.