Comparing the safety of iTind and UroLift for treating BPH
Official title: A Post-Market, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter International Study to Assess the Safety of the Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device (iTind) Compared to the UroLift® System in Subjects With Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Run by Olympus Corporation of the Americas · NCT04757116 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether the iTind device is safer than the UroLift procedure for men over 50 with symptoms from an enlarged prostate.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 50 Years and up |
| Sex | Men only |
| Enrollment | 256 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Olympus Corporation of the Americas Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 19 sites (Phoenix, Arizona and 18 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 26, 2022 |
| Main results expected | July 15, 2027 |
| Study ends | May 31, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | September 29, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT04757116 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are males aged 50 and older with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with prostate cancer or those who do not meet the specific eligibility criteria will not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study evaluates the safety of the iTind device in comparison to the UroLift procedure for treating lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Both treatments are minimally invasive options aimed at relieving symptoms associated with BPH. The study will involve male participants aged 50 and older who meet specific eligibility criteria, including certain prostate volume and symptom severity parameters. Participants will undergo assessments to compare the effectiveness and safety profiles of the two devices.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide patients with a safer and more effective treatment option for BPH symptoms.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown success with similar minimally invasive approaches for treating BPH, suggesting potential for positive outcomes in this comparison.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Diagnosis of lower urinary tract symptoms presumed to be secondary to benign prostatic enlargement causing bladder outlet obstruction for which treatment is recommended 2. Willing and able to provide informed consent 3. Males ≥ 50 years of age or older 4. PSA \< 4 ng/ml or if the PSA is 4 - 10 ng/ml, prostate cancer must be ruled out to the satisfaction of the Principal Investigator (PI) by local standard of care methods within prior 6 months 5. Prostate volume up to 75 cc (inclusive) documented by cross-sectional imaging (TRUS, MRI, etc.). Results from standard of care imaging may be accepted up to 6 months prior to Screening 6. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) for urinary symptoms ≥ 13 7. Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) of ≤ 15 mL/sec and ≥ 5 mL/sec (voided volume must be ≥ 125 mL) 8. Willing and able to complete all study visits including questionnaires at baseline and at follow-up visits Exclusion Criteria: 1. History of prostate cancer or suspected, should be ruled out to the satisfaction of the PI by local standard of care methods within prior 6 months 2. Confirmed bladder cancer within the last 2 years or currently suspected bladder cancer 3. History of acute bacterial prostatitis within the last 2 years 4. Median lobe obstruction of the prostate as confirmed by cross-sectional imaging 5. PSA value \> 10 ng/ml 6. Contraindicated for iTind or UroLift as determined by the PI 7. Neurogenic bladder and/or sphincter abnormalities due to Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, cerebral vascular accident, diabetes or other neurological disorders that affect bladder function 8. Clinically significant bladder diverticulum 9. Diagnosed with urethral stricture, meatal stenosis, bladder neck contracture, rectal disease, artificial urinary sphincter, incompetent sphincter, urinary incontinence due to incompetent sphincter 10. Prior rectal surgery (other than hemorrhoidectomy) or history of rectal disease treatment if the therapy may potentially cause injury to site (e.g., if a transrectal probe is used), pelvic radiotherapy or radical pelvic surgery, urinary diversion surgery, prostate surgery, balloon dilation, urethral stent implantation, laser prostatectomy, or any other invasive treatment to the prostate, or penile prosthesis if it may prevent insertion of the iTind or UroLift device 11. An active urinary tract infection during randomization 12. Clinically significant hematuria within the last 3 months or ongoing cystolithiasis 13. Prostate volume \> 75 cc 14. Post-void residual volume (PVR) \> 250 mL 15. Actively using catheterization or unable to void naturally 16. Unable to complete a 2-week washout period for alpha blockers prior to procedure or unable to discontinue 5ARIs or daily use of PDE5 inhibitors by the time of procedure 17. Taking anti-platelet or anticoagulants (except low dose aspirin - 81 mg - 100 mg) within the last 7 days prior to procedure 18. Known or suspected allergy to nickel, titanium or polyester/polypropylene
Where it's running
-
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, United States Recruiting -
Urology Associates of Central California
Fresno, California, United States Recruiting -
Golden State Urology
Sacramento, California, United States Recruiting -
The Urology Center
Omaha, Nebraska, United States Recruiting -
Pacific West Urology
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States Recruiting -
Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research / Northwell Health
Syosset, New York, United States Recruiting
Show 13 more locations
-
The Conrad Pearson Clinic
Germantown, Tennessee, United States Recruiting -
Midtown Urology Associates
Austin, Texas, United States Recruiting -
Houston Metro Urology
Houston, Texas, United States Recruiting -
The Urology Place
San Antonio, Texas, United States Recruiting -
Potomac Urology Center
Alexandria, Virginia, United States Recruiting -
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
Isleworth, Middlesex, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Queen Margaret Hospital
Dunfermline, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Frimley Park Hospital
London, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital
Norwich, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Arizona Urology Specialists
Tucson, Arizona, United States Terminated -
NorthShore University Health System Research Institute
Evanston, Illinois, United States Terminated -
Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States Active not recruiting -
Minnesota Urology
Woodbury, Minnesota, United States Withdrawn
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Bilal Chughtai, MD — Northwell Health
- Study coordinator: Melanie Bonds, MS
- Email: Melanie.Bonds@olympus.com
- Phone: +1-703-851-4615
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Compare three tools for removing large prostates: ThuFLEP, HoLEP, and B-TUEP
This trial tests whether three endoscopic techniques for large prostate removal are safe and effective in men with severe urinary symptoms who have not improved with medicines.
-
GRAIL Pulsed Field Ablation for Enlarged Prostate (BPH) safety and effectiveness
This study tests whether the ALPFA GRAIL Pulsed Field Ablation system can safely reduce BPH symptoms in men over 45 compared with a sham procedure.
-
Transperineal laser ablation to treat persistent obstruction from BPH after minimally invasive procedures
This test will try in-office transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) to relieve urinary blockage and symptoms in men whose BPH returned after prior minimally invasive treatments.
-
MRI/TRUS fusion–guided thermal vapor ablation for benign prostatic enlargement
This will try a targeted steam (thermal vapor) treatment guided by MRI and ultrasound to reduce urinary symptoms in men 45–85 with moderate to severe BPH who have not responded to or declined medications.
-
Comparing Optilume catheter and Rezum water-vapor therapy for enlarged prostate (BPH)
This compares Optilume catheter and Rezum water-vapor therapy to see which better eases lower urinary tract symptoms in men with enlarged prostates (BPH) sized 30–100 g.
-
Investigating the effects of an anti-inflammatory drug on benign prostatic hyperplasia
This study is testing whether an anti-inflammatory drug can help men with benign prostatic hyperplasia feel better and reduce the size of their prostate.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.