Clinical trial Recruiting at 15 sites Interventional Ages 50 and up Men only

Comparing the safety of iTind and UroLift for treating BPH

Official title: A Post-Market, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter International Study to Assess the Safety of the Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device (iTind) Compared to the UroLift® System in Subjects With Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Run by Olympus Corporation of the Americas · NCT04757116 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing whether the iTind device is safer than the UroLift procedure for men over 50 with symptoms from an enlarged prostate.

More Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages50 Years and up
SexMen only
Enrollment256 (estimated)
SponsorOlympus Corporation of the Americas
Industry-sponsored
Locations19 sites (Phoenix, Arizona and 18 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedSeptember 26, 2022
Main results expectedJuly 15, 2027
Study endsMay 31, 2030
Registry record updatedSeptember 29, 2026
Trial IDNCT04757116 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates for this study are males aged 50 and older with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement.

Probably not a fit

Patients with prostate cancer or those who do not meet the specific eligibility criteria will not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study evaluates the safety of the iTind device in comparison to the UroLift procedure for treating lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Both treatments are minimally invasive options aimed at relieving symptoms associated with BPH. The study will involve male participants aged 50 and older who meet specific eligibility criteria, including certain prostate volume and symptom severity parameters. Participants will undergo assessments to compare the effectiveness and safety profiles of the two devices.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide patients with a safer and more effective treatment option for BPH symptoms.

How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown success with similar minimally invasive approaches for treating BPH, suggesting potential for positive outcomes in this comparison.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Diagnosis of lower urinary tract symptoms presumed to be secondary to benign prostatic enlargement causing bladder outlet obstruction for which treatment is recommended
2. Willing and able to provide informed consent
3. Males ≥ 50 years of age or older
4. PSA \< 4 ng/ml or if the PSA is 4 - 10 ng/ml, prostate cancer must be ruled out to the satisfaction of the Principal Investigator (PI) by local standard of care methods within prior 6 months
5. Prostate volume up to 75 cc (inclusive) documented by cross-sectional imaging (TRUS, MRI, etc.). Results from standard of care imaging may be accepted up to 6 months prior to Screening
6. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) for urinary symptoms ≥ 13
7. Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) of ≤ 15 mL/sec and ≥ 5 mL/sec (voided volume must be ≥ 125 mL)
8. Willing and able to complete all study visits including questionnaires at baseline and at follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

1. History of prostate cancer or suspected, should be ruled out to the satisfaction of the PI by local standard of care methods within prior 6 months
2. Confirmed bladder cancer within the last 2 years or currently suspected bladder cancer
3. History of acute bacterial prostatitis within the last 2 years
4. Median lobe obstruction of the prostate as confirmed by cross-sectional imaging
5. PSA value \> 10 ng/ml
6. Contraindicated for iTind or UroLift as determined by the PI
7. Neurogenic bladder and/or sphincter abnormalities due to Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, cerebral vascular accident, diabetes or other neurological disorders that affect bladder function
8. Clinically significant bladder diverticulum
9. Diagnosed with urethral stricture, meatal stenosis, bladder neck contracture, rectal disease, artificial urinary sphincter, incompetent sphincter, urinary incontinence due to incompetent sphincter
10. Prior rectal surgery (other than hemorrhoidectomy) or history of rectal disease treatment if the therapy may potentially cause injury to site (e.g., if a transrectal probe is used), pelvic radiotherapy or radical pelvic surgery, urinary diversion surgery, prostate surgery, balloon dilation, urethral stent implantation, laser prostatectomy, or any other invasive treatment to the prostate, or penile prosthesis if it may prevent insertion of the iTind or UroLift device
11. An active urinary tract infection during randomization
12. Clinically significant hematuria within the last 3 months or ongoing cystolithiasis
13. Prostate volume \> 75 cc
14. Post-void residual volume (PVR) \> 250 mL
15. Actively using catheterization or unable to void naturally
16. Unable to complete a 2-week washout period for alpha blockers prior to procedure or unable to discontinue 5ARIs or daily use of PDE5 inhibitors by the time of procedure
17. Taking anti-platelet or anticoagulants (except low dose aspirin - 81 mg - 100 mg) within the last 7 days prior to procedure
18. Known or suspected allergy to nickel, titanium or polyester/polypropylene

Where it's running

  • Mayo Clinic Arizona
    Phoenix, Arizona, United States
    Recruiting
  • Urology Associates of Central California
    Fresno, California, United States
    Recruiting
  • Golden State Urology
    Sacramento, California, United States
    Recruiting
  • The Urology Center
    Omaha, Nebraska, United States
    Recruiting
  • Pacific West Urology
    Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
    Recruiting
  • Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research / Northwell Health
    Syosset, New York, United States
    Recruiting
Show 13 more locations
  • The Conrad Pearson Clinic
    Germantown, Tennessee, United States
    Recruiting
  • Midtown Urology Associates
    Austin, Texas, United States
    Recruiting
  • Houston Metro Urology
    Houston, Texas, United States
    Recruiting
  • The Urology Place
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
    Recruiting
  • Potomac Urology Center
    Alexandria, Virginia, United States
    Recruiting
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
    Isleworth, Middlesex, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Queen Margaret Hospital
    Dunfermline, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Frimley Park Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital
    Norwich, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Arizona Urology Specialists
    Tucson, Arizona, United States
    Terminated
  • NorthShore University Health System Research Institute
    Evanston, Illinois, United States
    Terminated
  • Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System
    New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
    Active not recruiting
  • Minnesota Urology
    Woodbury, Minnesota, United States
    Withdrawn

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.