Comparing TachoSil and Surgicel Original to control mild-to-moderate soft tissue bleeding during open surgery
Official title: An Open Label, Prospective, Randomized, Parallel Groups, Multicenter Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of TachoSil® Versus Surgicel™ Original (Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose) as an Adjunct to Control Mild to Moderate Soft Tissue Bleeding During Surgery.
Run by Corza Medical GmbH · NCT06664775 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This test compares TachoSil and Surgicel Original to see which stops mild-to-moderate soft tissue bleeding better during certain elective open surgeries.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 3 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 1 Month and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 116 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Corza Medical GmbH Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 9 sites (Torrance, California and 8 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 2, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | June 30, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06664775 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults having elective open abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, or thoracic surgery who develop an intraoperative mild-to-moderate soft tissue bleed suitable for a local hemostatic patch measuring under 21 cm2 and that can be pressed for three minutes.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients having cardiovascular, hepatic, laparoscopic, or robotic procedures, those with coagulation disorders or unmodifiable anticoagulation, very low hemoglobin/platelets, high INR, or acute major bleeding are unlikely to benefit or be eligible.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In this Phase 3 interventional trial, patients undergoing elective open abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, or thoracic surgery who develop a small area of mild-to-moderate soft tissue bleeding are treated intraoperatively with one of two local hemostatic products. The bleeding target site (TBS) must be under 21 cm2 and meet Grade 1–2 on the VIBe scale, and the assigned product is applied and pressed for up to three minutes after randomization. The study compares clinical hemostasis effectiveness and safety outcomes between TachoSil and Surgicel Original. Patients with cardiovascular, hepatic, laparoscopic/robotic procedures, significant coagulation disorders, or acute major bleeding are excluded.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the results could identify a more effective or safer local hemostatic option to reduce bleeding, shorten operative time, and lower complication risk.
How similar studies have gone: Both TachoSil and Surgicel have prior clinical use and supporting studies for local hemostasis, but direct head-to-head comparisons in this specific setting are relatively limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Elective open abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, or thoracic surgery. Elective transplant surgery except for liver or heart transplants is included. 2. The participant has a need for secondary hemostatic study intervention at the TBS with mild to moderate bleeding Grade 1 and Grade 2 according to the VIBe Scale. 3. Presence of an appropriate mild to moderate bleeding soft tissue TBS identified intra-operatively by the surgeon. 4. The TBS size \< 21 cm2/3.3 in2. 5. Ability to firmly press study intervention at TBS until 3 minutes after randomization. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Participants undergoing cardiovascular, hepatic, and laparoscopic and robotic surgeries. 2. Congenital or acquired disorders of coagulation. 3. Diseases requiring constant use of any anticoagulant drugs that cannot be safely washed out prior to randomization. 4. Screening Hemoglobin \< 9 mg/dL, platelets \< 75 × 103/µL, and/or international normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.5. 5. Acute major bleeding during surgery. 6. Participant with TBS in an actively infected field. 7. Target bleeding site is from large defects in arteries or veins where the injured vascular wall requires repair with maintenance of vessel patency. 8. Target bleeding site with major arterial bleeding requiring suture or mechanical ligation. 9. Bleeding site is in, around, or in proximity to foramina in bone, or areas of bony confine. 10. Participants with Grade '0', '3', and '4' bleeding at TBS according to VIBe Scale.
Where it's running
-
Torrance Memorial
Torrance, California, United States Recruiting -
St. Anthony Hospital
Lakewood, Colorado, United States Recruiting -
Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States Recruiting -
University Of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States Recruiting -
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States Recruiting -
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, United States Recruiting
Show 3 more locations
-
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States Recruiting -
Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States Recruiting -
The Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Jeff Wilson
- Email: Jeff.wilson@corza.com
- Phone: 1 416-578-9058
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Simplified Tranexamic Acid Regimen for Trauma with Hemorrhage
This trial tests a simplified TXA dosing approach to see if it safely helps adults with major trauma and significant bleeding.
-
Bleeding control after single-ray amputation: Hemocoll vs Avitene vs bone wax
This trial tests whether Hemocoll, Avitene, or bone wax better stop bleeding from exposed bone after a planned single-ray amputation in adults.
-
Tailored lower‑intensity blood thinner plan after left atrial appendage closure to prevent stroke
This project tests whether people with non‑valvular atrial fibrillation who get a left atrial appendage closure can stop blood thinners after taking low‑dose apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) for 3 months, compared with people who stay on standard‑dose DOACs.
-
Catheter ablation plus LAAC vs anticoagulation in frail elderly A-fib patients
This study tests whether adding left atrial appendage closure to ablation is as good as using long-term blood thinners in frail people aged 75 and up with atrial fibrillation.
-
Preventing pneumonia after brain hemorrhage with extra mouth care and preventive antibiotics
This will test whether enhanced oral hygiene combined with preventive antibiotics can help adults who recently had a spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage avoid pneumonia.
-
Comparing tranexamic acid dosing during heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass
This research will test whether three different tranexamic acid dosing schedules keep fibrinolysis suppressed longer and limit bleeding in adults having elective heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.