Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Comparing single-port and multi-port robotic surgery for rectal cancer

Official title: Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Single-port Versus Multi-port Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: a Phase 2 Non-randomized Controlled Study Based on the IDEAL Framework

Run by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University · NCT06824688 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing whether single-port robotic surgery is safer and helps patients recover faster than multi-port robotic surgery for people with rectal cancer.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment40 (estimated)
SponsorDaping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Chongqing)
StatusRecruiting
StartedApril 26, 2025
Main results expectedDecember 31, 2027
Study endsDecember 31, 2027
Registry record updatedAugust 4, 2026
Trial IDNCT06824688 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates include adults over 18 with stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma who are eligible for anal sphincter-preserving surgery.

Probably not a fit

Patients with previous rectal resections, acute intestinal obstruction, or certain hereditary conditions may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This clinical trial evaluates the safety and short-term clinical efficacy of single-port robotic total mesorectal excision compared to multi-port robotic total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer. It follows the IDEAL framework and focuses on various clinical outcomes, including intraoperative complications, blood loss, and postoperative recovery metrics. The study aims to determine which surgical approach offers better results in terms of complications and recovery time for patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical outcomes and recovery for rectal cancer patients.

How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored robotic surgery techniques, but this specific comparison of single-port versus multi-port approaches is relatively novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria comprised: (1) MRI-confirmed distal tumor margin \<15 cm from the anal verge, (2) biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma, (3) clinical stage I-III (AJCC 8th edition) with potential downstaging post-neoadjuvant therapy, (4) intent-to-treat with sphincter preservation and primary anastomosis, (5) documented informed consent, and (6) adult patients (≥18 years).

Where it's running

  • Huichao Zheng
    Chongqing, China
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.