Comparing single-port and multi-port robotic surgery for rectal cancer
Official title: Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Single-port Versus Multi-port Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: a Phase 2 Non-randomized Controlled Study Based on the IDEAL Framework
Run by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University · NCT06824688 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether single-port robotic surgery is safer and helps patients recover faster than multi-port robotic surgery for people with rectal cancer.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Chongqing) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 26, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | August 4, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06824688 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include adults over 18 with stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma who are eligible for anal sphincter-preserving surgery.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with previous rectal resections, acute intestinal obstruction, or certain hereditary conditions may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial evaluates the safety and short-term clinical efficacy of single-port robotic total mesorectal excision compared to multi-port robotic total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer. It follows the IDEAL framework and focuses on various clinical outcomes, including intraoperative complications, blood loss, and postoperative recovery metrics. The study aims to determine which surgical approach offers better results in terms of complications and recovery time for patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical outcomes and recovery for rectal cancer patients.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored robotic surgery techniques, but this specific comparison of single-port versus multi-port approaches is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria comprised: (1) MRI-confirmed distal tumor margin \<15 cm from the anal verge, (2) biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma, (3) clinical stage I-III (AJCC 8th edition) with potential downstaging post-neoadjuvant therapy, (4) intent-to-treat with sphincter preservation and primary anastomosis, (5) documented informed consent, and (6) adult patients (≥18 years).
Where it's running
-
Huichao Zheng
Chongqing, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Huichao Zheng, MD
- Email: 625730455@qq.com
- Phone: 68757350
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
NeoCSR-Omics: CAPOX and Serplulimab Before or After Short-Course RT in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
This trial tests whether giving CAPOX chemotherapy with the PD-1 blocker serplulimab before or after short-course radiotherapy helps people with locally advanced rectal cancer achieve complete clinical or pathological responses.
-
PPISR for low- to mid-rectal cancer with anus-sparing aim
This study tests whether Precision Partial Intersphincteric Resection can be safely used to remove certain rectal cancers while preserving the anus.
-
BT-001 plus pembrolizumab for localized pMMR rectal cancer
This early-phase trial tests whether adding the oncolytic virus BT-001 to pembrolizumab is safe and tolerable for adults with localized pMMR rectal cancer prior to definitive surgery.
-
Transanal vs Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer
This study tests whether taTME or robot-assisted TME works better for low rectal cancer patients and whether one method leads to fewer complications or conversions.
-
Single-port robotic vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for proximal stomach cancer
This trial tests whether a single-port robotic approach can safely and effectively remove proximal stomach cancer compared with conventional laparoscopy.
-
Gynecological and sexual aftereffects following rectal cancer treatment
This work will test whether gynecological anatomical changes after rectal cancer treatment are linked to ongoing sexual problems in women aged 18–60 who are in remission.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.