Comparing radial and femoral access for treating acute basilar artery occlusion
Official title: Radial Versus Femoral Access For Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Run by Jinling Hospital, China · NCT05903560 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether using a wrist (radial) access instead of a groin (femoral) access for treating a specific type of stroke can lead to better results for patients.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 386 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Jinling Hospital, China Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Nanjing, Jiangsu) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 22, 2023 |
| Main results expected | September 2026 |
| Study ends | September 2026 |
| Registry record updated | April 30, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT05903560 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include adults aged 18 and older with acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation and confirmed basilar artery occlusion.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with pre-stroke disabilities, severe hypertension, or those participating in other clinical trials may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study investigates the effectiveness of two different access methods, radial and femoral, for endovascular recanalization in patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion. The trial aims to determine if the radial approach can provide similar or improved outcomes compared to the traditional femoral approach. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive treatment via either access method within 24 hours of symptom onset. The study will assess various outcomes including operation duration, fluoroscopy time, and safety measures.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved treatment options for patients with acute ischemic stroke, potentially enhancing recovery outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown promising results for the radial approach in similar interventions, suggesting potential for success in this trial.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation confirmed by symptoms and imaging examinations. 2. Basilar artery occlusion confirmed by computed tomographic angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). 3. Age ≥ 18 years. 4. Time from symptom onset to randomization within 24 hours of the estimated time of basilar artery occlusion. 5. Baseline NIHSS score ≥ 10 before randomization. 6. Intact dual circulation of the hand assessed by the modified Allen's test. 7. Written informed consent from patients or their legally authorized representatives. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Pre-stroke disability with mRS score ≥ 3. 2. Pregnant or lactating women. 3. Allergic to contrast agents or nitinol devices. 4. Participation in other clinical trials. 5. Systolic blood pressure \> 185 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \> 110mmHg, and can not be controlled by antihypertensive drugs. 6. Known genetic or acquired bleeding diathesis, lack of coagulation factors; or oral anticoagulant therapy with INR \> 1.7. 7. Baseline lab values: blood glucose \< 50mg/dL (2.8mmol/L) or \> 400mg/dL (22.2 mmol/L), platelet count \< 50\*109 /L, or hematocrit \< 25%. 8. Life expectancy less than 1 year. 9. Lost to follow-up within 90 days (e.g. no fixed residence, overseas patients, etc.). 10. Acute ischemic stroke within 48 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention, cerebrovascular intervention, or major surgery (patients can be included if more than 48 hours). 11. Clinical manifestations of central nervous system vasculitis. 12. Premorbid nervous system diseases or mental disorders hindering the assessment of the disease. 13. Diseases or anatomical abnormalities that make it difficult for radial or femoral artery puncture, sheath insertion or instrument delivery, such as local infection, anatomical abnormalities confirmed by ultrasound or other imaging examinations, previous interventional or open surgery.
Where it's running
-
Department of Neurology, Jinling Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Xinfeng Liu, MD — Department of Neurology, Jinling Hospital, China
- Study coordinator: Rui Liu, MD
- Email: liurui8616@163.com
- Phone: +86 2584801861
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Short-Term outside-in nerve stimulation for acute ischemic stroke
This trial tests whether a 5-day external trigeminal nerve stimulation given after stroke can help more patients recover better than a sham treatment.
-
Sevoflurane vs. Propofol for anesthesia in stroke patients undergoing clot-removal
This study tests whether sevoflurane or propofol used for anesthesia during endovascular treatment of an acute ischemic stroke affects the final brain damage and recovery.
-
Safety of adding NRICM301 to standard care for adults with acute ischemic stroke
This study tests whether adding NRICM301, a traditional Chinese medicine formula, to usual care is safe for adults with acute ischemic stroke.
-
Intracranial Recanalization with LT3001 in Acute Ischemic Stroke
This phase II study tests whether LT3001 given to adults with acute ischemic stroke can help reopen blocked brain arteries.
-
Mobilisation After Endovascular Stroke Treatment
This study checks whether moving around 12 hours after endovascular stroke treatment is as safe as moving around 24 hours for people with an acute ischemic stroke.
-
Endovascular therapy plus standard care vs standard care alone for distal and medium vessel strokes
In people with acute ischemic stroke due to distal or medium vessel blockages, this study tests whether adding endovascular treatment to the usual medical care helps improve outcomes compared with medical care alone.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.