Comparing pulsed-field ablation to a sham procedure for treating atrial fibrillation
Official title: Pulsed-field Ablation Versus Sham Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation
Run by Charles University, Czech Republic · NCT05717725 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether a new treatment called pulsed-field ablation can help people with atrial fibrillation feel better and improve their quality of life compared to a fake procedure.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 3 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Charles University, Czech Republic Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Prague) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 27, 2023 |
| Main results expected | September 1, 2025 |
| Study ends | February 28, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 22, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT05717725 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults over 18 years old with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation and an AFEQT score of 50 or lower.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation, untreated other arrhythmias, or significant comorbidities may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial is a single-blind, multicenter, prospective, randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy of pulsed-field ablation (PFA) compared to a sham ablation procedure in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). A total of sixty subjects will be randomized to receive either PFA or sham treatment after undergoing an electrophysiology (EP) study to rule out other arrhythmias. The primary outcomes include freedom from recurrent AF and quality of life improvements measured by the AFEQT score at six months post-procedure. The study aims to provide insights into the effectiveness of PFA in managing AF symptoms and improving patient quality of life.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a new effective treatment option for patients suffering from atrial fibrillation, potentially leading to improved symptom management and quality of life.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown promising results with catheter ablation techniques for atrial fibrillation, suggesting that this approach may be effective, although pulsed-field ablation specifically is still being evaluated.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age \>18 years; 2. Paroxysmal or Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (but not long-standing Persistent AF); 3. AFEQT score ≤ 50. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Any prior AF ablation procedure (or left atrial ablation procedure) 2. Untreated other arrhythmias (e.g. atrial flutter, SVT, VT, frequent PVCs); 3. Long-standing Persistent AF episodes (any continuous episodes lasting \> 1 year); 4. Permanent AF; 5. No ECG evidence of AF episode \>30 seconds in the 6 months prior to randomization; 6. LA size \> 55 mm; 7. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; 8. Valve disease (any aortic stenosis, moderate or severe mitral regurgitation); 9. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% according to echocardiogram within 6 months of randomization; 10. Moderate or severe pulmonary hypertension; 11. History of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy; 12. Symptomatic coronary artery disease; 13. Pregnancy; 14. Presence of an artificial valve; 15. Life expectancy less than two years; 16. Known medical condition or contraindication causing potential complications for interventional procedures or follow up.
Where it's running
-
Cardiocenter, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
Prague, Czechia Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
AI-based tools to help diagnose, treat and predict stroke outcomes across multiple hospitals
This study tests AI-powered tools on real-world stroke patients to see if they can improve pre-hospital triage, diagnosis, and outcome prediction while data stay securely within each hospital.
-
Left-atrial Fibrosis in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Its Comorbidities
This study tests how comorbid conditions like sleep apnea and primary aldosteronism relate to left-atrial fibrosis and AF recurrence in patients undergoing ablation.
-
Dual Energy ablation with SmartTouch SF catheter in persistent atrial fibrillation
This study tests a pulsed field and radiofrequency ablation system to treat persistent atrial fibrillation in adults who have not responded well to prior medications.
-
Identifying AF patients who may need more than standard ablation using Volta AF-Xplorer II
This trial tests whether AI-identified dispersion areas during AF ablation can predict recurrence after a standard pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent AF.
-
4D intracardiac echocardiography to guide left atrial appendage occlusion procedures
A new 4D ICE catheter is being tested alongside standard imaging to see if it can safely guide left atrial appendage occlusion procedures for adults with atrial fibrillation.
-
Thoracoscopic vs Catheter Ablation as the First Rhythm Control in Atrial Fibrillation with a Large Left Atrium
This trial tests whether thoracoscopic surgical ablation is better at keeping atrial fibrillation under control than catheter ablation in people with persistent AF and a large left atrium who have not had an ablation before.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.