Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Phase 4 Interventional

Comparing Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy and Pneumatic Compression for Preventing Blood Clots in ICU Patients

Official title: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF) Compared to Conventional Mechanical Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

Run by Science Valley Research Institute · NCT06958588 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing whether Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy works better than pneumatic compression to prevent blood clots in ICU patients who can't take medication for it.

Quick facts

PhasePhase 4
Study typeInterventional
SexAll
Enrollment50 (estimated)
SponsorScience Valley Research Institute
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Belo Horizonte, BH)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMay 25, 2025
Main results expectedDecember 20, 2025
Study endsMarch 20, 2026
Registry record updatedMay 6, 2025
Trial IDNCT06958588 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are ICU patients over 18 years old with a PADUA score greater than 4 or a Caprini score greater than 3, who have contraindications to pharmacological prophylaxis.

Probably not a fit

Patients under 18 years old, those unable to use mechanical prophylaxis due to physical limitations, or those with a life expectancy of less than 24 hours may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF) compared to conventional pneumatic compression for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). It is a prospective, randomized, open-label study involving patients who are at risk for VTE and cannot receive pharmacological prophylaxis. Participants will be enrolled from two hospitals in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, and will be monitored using standardized clinical evaluations and data collection methods. The study will assess the outcomes of both interventions to determine which is more effective in preventing VTE.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a non-pharmacological option for preventing blood clots in ICU patients who cannot take traditional medications.

How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored mechanical prophylaxis for VTE, but the specific use of PEMF therapy in this context is relatively novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients \> 18 years old in ICU
2. PADUA score\> 4 (medical patients) and/or Caprini score\> 3 (surgical patients)
3. Contraindication to pharmacological prophylaxis or indication to combined (pharmacological and mechanical VTE prophylaxis)

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients \< 18 years old in ICU
2. Unable to use mechanical prophylaxis due to trauma, burns, fracture, or problems in inferior members that prevent the use of mechanical prophylaxis
3. Life expectations less than 24 hours

Where it's running

  • Hospital Vera Cruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
    Belo Horizonte, Bh, Brazil
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.