Comparing Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy and Pneumatic Compression for Preventing Blood Clots in ICU Patients
Official title: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF) Compared to Conventional Mechanical Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
Run by Science Valley Research Institute · NCT06958588 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy works better than pneumatic compression to prevent blood clots in ICU patients who can't take medication for it.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 4 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 50 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Science Valley Research Institute Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Belo Horizonte, BH) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 25, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 20, 2025 |
| Study ends | March 20, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | May 6, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06958588 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are ICU patients over 18 years old with a PADUA score greater than 4 or a Caprini score greater than 3, who have contraindications to pharmacological prophylaxis.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients under 18 years old, those unable to use mechanical prophylaxis due to physical limitations, or those with a life expectancy of less than 24 hours may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF) compared to conventional pneumatic compression for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). It is a prospective, randomized, open-label study involving patients who are at risk for VTE and cannot receive pharmacological prophylaxis. Participants will be enrolled from two hospitals in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, and will be monitored using standardized clinical evaluations and data collection methods. The study will assess the outcomes of both interventions to determine which is more effective in preventing VTE.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a non-pharmacological option for preventing blood clots in ICU patients who cannot take traditional medications.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored mechanical prophylaxis for VTE, but the specific use of PEMF therapy in this context is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients \> 18 years old in ICU 2. PADUA score\> 4 (medical patients) and/or Caprini score\> 3 (surgical patients) 3. Contraindication to pharmacological prophylaxis or indication to combined (pharmacological and mechanical VTE prophylaxis) Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients \< 18 years old in ICU 2. Unable to use mechanical prophylaxis due to trauma, burns, fracture, or problems in inferior members that prevent the use of mechanical prophylaxis 3. Life expectations less than 24 hours
Where it's running
-
Hospital Vera Cruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
Belo Horizonte, Bh, Brazil Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Eduardo Fonseca Sad, MD
- Email: edu.sad@uol.com.br
- Phone: +55 31 991717860
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Aspirin vs. rivaroxaban for blood clot prevention in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients on IMiD-based therapy, this study tests whether aspirin or rivaroxaban is better at preventing blood clots.
-
DoACs vs LMWH for blood flow after knee replacement
This study tests whether rivaroxaban, apixaban, or LMWH work differently to support blood flow in the legs after total knee replacement in adults.
-
TRiP-cast score test in adults with acute lower-limb injuries requiring immobilization
This study tests whether the TRiP(cast) score can predict risk of blood clots in adults with acute lower-limb injuries treated as outpatients.
-
Pulmonary Embolism Registry from Emergency Care to Long-Term Follow-Up
This registry follows adults with acute pulmonary embolism to see how care is given in the real world and what happens over time.
-
Prognostic value of the 2026 AHA/ACC PE classification in ED patients with acute PE
This study tests whether the 2026 AHA/ACC five-category PE classification helps predict 30-day major adverse pulmonary embolism events in adults with acute PE presenting to the ED.
-
YKYY033 Injection safety and tolerability in adults
This study tests whether a single dose of YKYY033 injection is safe and tolerable in healthy adults aged 18–55.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.