Comparing pelvic stabilization exercises and neuromuscular facilitation for pain relief

Comparison of Pelvic Stabilization Exercises and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Pain, Disability and Functional Leg Length in Patients With Anterior Innominate Iliosacral Dysfunction.

Not applicable Interventional Riphah International University · NCT06108960

This study is testing whether pelvic stabilization exercises or a different technique called neuromuscular facilitation can help people with certain pelvic pain feel better and move more easily.

Quick facts

PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment26 (estimated)
Ages25 Years to 45 Years
SexAll
SponsorRiphah International University Academic / other
Locations1 site (Lahore, Punjab)
Trial IDNCT06108960 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pelvic stabilization exercises versus proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in alleviating pain, reducing disability, and improving functional leg length in patients suffering from anterior innominate iliosacral dysfunction. A total of 26 participants aged 25 to 45 will be recruited and divided into two groups, with one receiving pelvic stabilization exercises and the other undergoing proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation over an eight-week period. The study will utilize various outcome measures, including pain ratings and functional assessments, to determine the impact of each intervention. Ethical approval has been obtained from the Riphah International University ethical committee.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Ideal candidates are individuals aged 25 to 45 with recent episodes of lumbopelvic pain and specific clinical signs of anterior innominate dysfunction.

Not a fit: Patients with other systemic illnesses affecting the lower back or extremities, or those who have undergone major surgeries in the relevant area, may not benefit from this study.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide effective non-invasive treatment options for patients suffering from anterior innominate iliosacral dysfunction.

How similar studies have performed: While there is existing evidence supporting the benefits of stabilization exercises for chronic low back pain, this specific comparison of interventions is relatively novel.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patient within ages of 25 and 45 years.
* Both male and female participants will be included.
* Episode of Lumbopelvic pain within the previous 6 weeks with pain radiating till the knee and associated groin pain.
* Pain and tenderness at SIJ
* The diagnostic criteria for SJD were five clinical tests Compression, Distraction, sacral thrust, thigh thrust and Gaenslen test (patient with a minimum of 3 positive results among the 5 provocation tests)
* Positive Special test for Anterior Innominate Dysfunction (Standing flexion test, Seated flexion test, Supine to sit test and Gillet test)
* NPRS = 3 to 6

Exclusion Criteria:

* Any other medical/systemic illness relevant to lower back and lower extremity
* Previous major surgery for lower back and lower extremity
* SLR Less than 45°
* Pain radiating past the knee
* Pregnant and lactating females
* Had been diagnosed by physician with a diagnosis other than SIJD
* Receiving manual therapy for the sacroiliac joint in the past 3 month

Where this trial is running

Lahore, Punjab

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions Anterior Innominate Iliosacral DysfunctionAnterior innominate Iliosacral DysfunctionFunctional leg lengthPelvic Stabilization ExerciseProprioceptive Neuromuscular FacilitationDisability
Last reviewed 2026-06-13 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.