Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 100 Women only

Comparing open and robotic surgery for women with complex pelvic masses

Official title: MIRRORS-FROZEN - A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) Comparing Open Vs Robotic Surgery in the Management of Women With Complex Pelvic Adnexal Masses ≤ 8cm.

Run by Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · NCT06638593 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing whether open surgery or robotic surgery is better for women with suspicious pelvic masses that are 8 cm or smaller.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 100 Years
SexWomen only
Enrollment25 (estimated)
SponsorRoyal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Guildford)
StatusRecruiting
StartedSeptember 23, 2024
Main results expectedDecember 1, 2026
Study endsFebruary 1, 2027
Registry record updatedNovember 2, 2026
Trial IDNCT06638593 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are women aged 18 to 100 with complex adnexal masses measuring 8 cm or less and no evidence of malignant disease outside the adnexae.

Probably not a fit

Patients with adnexal masses larger than 8 cm or those with advanced-stage disease (stage III or IV) will not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This pilot study, MIRRORS-FROZEN, aims to evaluate the feasibility of a new protocol for managing complex adnexal masses in women, specifically comparing open surgery to robotic surgery. Patients with masses that are 8 cm or smaller and deemed suspicious for cancer will be recruited and randomized to one of the two surgical approaches. The study will also assess various surgical, oncological, and patient-reported outcomes to determine the viability of conducting a larger multi-center randomized controlled trial in the future. The goal is to improve surgical management and reduce overtreatment in cases where masses are benign or borderline.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to more accurate surgical management of adnexal masses, potentially reducing unnecessary surgeries for benign conditions.

How similar studies have gone: While this approach is novel in its specific comparison of robotic versus open surgery for this indication, similar studies have shown promise in improving surgical outcomes for adnexal masses.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Complex adnexal Pelvic mass/es ≤8 cm with no malignant disease outside the adnexae on CT or MRI.
* Women aged ≥18 \& ≤100 years old.
* Patients who had given their signed and written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Adnexal pelvic mass \> 8 cm.
* Radiological or histological or cytological evidence of stage III or IV disease.
* Lack of capacity to understand and give informed consent.
* Patients not suitable for laparoscopic surgery, such as but not limited to those with severe aortic stenosis.
* Any patient randomized to either of the study arms and found to have disease which appears greater than stage 1 will be withdrawn from the trial and treated according to the national guidelines

Where it's running

  • The Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
    Guildford, United Kingdom
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

  • Improving diagnosis of ovarian cancer using imaging methods

    This study is trying to improve how doctors diagnose ovarian cancer by using different imaging techniques and descriptions to better tell the difference between harmless and harmful growths in the ovaries.

    Recruiting University of Aarhus · Aarhus · NCT05842629

  • CG-7321: a first-in-human test in advanced solid tumors

    We’re testing CG-7321 alone and with fulvestrant to see if it’s safe and tolerable in adults with advanced solid tumors.

    Recruiting at 4 sites Phase 1 Chengdu Cynogen Bio-pharmaceutical Tech. Co., Ltd. · Fuzhou, Fujian and 3 other locations · NCT07923214

  • CR-002 study in adults with advanced solid tumors

    This trial tests CR-002 as a single therapy to see if it is safe and tolerable in adults with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors

    Recruiting at 3 sites Phase 1/2 Crescent Biopharma, Inc. · Austin, Texas and 2 other locations · NCT07909031

  • VT-101 in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: early safety study in adults

    This early-phase trial tests VT-101 in adult women with advanced, recurrent, or relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer to see if it is safe, how the body handles it, and whether there are any initial signs of activity.

    Recruiting Phase 1 University of Iowa · Iowa City, Iowa · NCT07905677

  • Methylation markers in self-samples to help detect gynecological cancers

    This study tests whether self-collected urine and vaginal samples can reveal DNA methylation or other genetic markers that indicate endometrial, ovarian, vulvar, or vaginal cancers in women who are at risk or have postmenopausal bleeding.

    Recruiting Universiteit Antwerpen · Edegem, Antwerp · NCT07902375

  • Radiotherapy for gynecologic cancer with up to 10 metastatic sites

    This registry follows adults with gynecologic cancer who have 1 to 10 active metastatic lesions and are treated with radiotherapy as part of routine care to see how such treatments work in real-world settings.

    Recruiting Affidea Nu-med Center of Oncological DIagnostics and Therapy · Zamość · NCT07883798

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.