Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 99

Comparing neck dissection techniques for thyroid cancer treatment

Official title: Comparison of Two Routes of Surgical Approach to Lateral Cervical Node Dissection in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients With Lateral Metastatic Disease: Randomized Clinical Trial

Run by Centro de Excelencia en Enfermedades de Cabeza y Cuello · NCT06149637 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing two different surgical methods for removing lymph nodes in patients with thyroid cancer to see which one causes fewer problems afterward.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 99 Years
SexAll
Enrollment62 (estimated)
SponsorCentro de Excelencia en Enfermedades de Cabeza y Cuello
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Medellín, Antioquia)
StatusRecruiting
StartedAugust 1, 2023
Main results expectedAugust 31, 2025
Study endsAugust 31, 2028
Registry record updatedOctober 29, 2024
Trial IDNCT06149637 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 18 and older with confirmed lateral lymph node involvement due to differentiated thyroid cancer.

Probably not a fit

Patients with a history of previous neck dissection or those diagnosed with medullary or anaplastic carcinoma may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study aims to evaluate the shoulder and neck morbidity associated with two different surgical approaches for cervical lateral nodal dissection in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer and lateral metastases. Specifically, it compares the traditional neck dissection approach with an anterior approach to the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The study will involve patients who have confirmed lymph node involvement and will assess the effectiveness and complications of each surgical method. By analyzing outcomes, the research seeks to determine the optimal surgical technique for minimizing morbidity while effectively treating thyroid cancer.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical techniques that reduce complications for patients undergoing treatment for thyroid cancer.

How similar studies have gone: While there have been studies on neck dissection techniques, this specific comparison of anterior versus traditional approaches in the context of differentiated thyroid cancer is relatively novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients ≥ 18 years.
2. Patients with macroscopic lymph node involvement identified by physical examination, imaging or intraoperatively in lateral neck.
3. Patients with microscopic nodal involvement confirmed by FNAB (definition by the pathologist of suspected or confirmed metastatic papillary carcinoma according to the Bethesda criteria)
4. Candidates for lateral lymph node dissection due to suspected or confirmed disease metastatic lymph nodes as defined by the treating surgeon.
5. Patients requiring or not requiring thyroidectomy and/or central dissection concomitant with the dissection

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with a history of previous neck dissection
2. Histological confirmation of medullary or anaplastic carcinoma
3. Previous spinal nerve injury

Where it's running

  • Hospital Alma Mater de Antioquia
    Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Browse more
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.