Comparing low tidal volume and airway pressure release ventilation for ARDS patients
Official title: Effects of Low Tidal Volume and Airway Pressure Release Ventilation on Lung Tissue Mechanics in ARDS Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study
Run by Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology · NCT06790875 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests which breathing method, low tidal volume or airway pressure release ventilation, helps adults with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome breathe better and feel safer while on a ventilator.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 15 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Wuhan, Hubei) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 20, 2024 |
| Main results expected | November 20, 2025 |
| Study ends | November 20, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | January 24, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06790875 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 18 to 80 who meet the diagnostic criteria for ARDS and require mechanical ventilation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with chronic respiratory conditions, severe arrhythmias, or those who are pregnant or breastfeeding may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effects of low tidal volume ventilation (LTV) and airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) on lung tissue mechanics in adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). The study will involve a prospective randomized crossover design, where participants will receive both ventilation methods to determine which one better improves lung mechanics and enhances patient safety. The trial will include patients who are within 12 hours of starting invasive mechanical ventilation and will assess their response to each ventilation mode.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved ventilation strategies that enhance lung function and safety for ARDS patients.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored ventilation strategies in ARDS, but this specific comparison of LTV and APRV is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Meets the diagnostic criteria of the 2023 Global New Definition of ARDS. 2. Age: 18-80 years. 3. PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200. 4. Within 12 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation treatment. 5. Obtain consent from the patient or their family members to participate in the study, and sign the informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Age \< 18 years or \> 80 years. 2. Uncorrected shock of any type. 3. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary embolism, right heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, or severe arrhythmia. 4. Contraindications for using Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) (extensive chest skin damage, infection, pacemaker implantation, implanted automatic defibrillator, etc.), pneumothorax, mediastinal emphysema, or large pleural effusion. 5. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 6. Patients planned for ECMO treatment. 7. Patients currently participating in or previously enrolled in other clinical studies.
Where it's running
-
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Xiaojing Zou Professor
- Email: 13995518630@163.com
- Phone: 13995518630
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pulse Wave vs Saline Bolus EIT to measure lung perfusion in ARDS
This study tests whether pulse wave EIT or saline bolus EIT can best show lung blood flow in ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation.
-
Biorepository and endotyping study for ARDS patients
This observational study tests whether creating a centralized ARDS biorepository and data set can help develop endotype and treatment-prediction tools for adults with ARDS.
-
BAL balance: ARDS through lung lavage and imaging to find different ARDS types
This study tests how bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and chest CT imaging can reveal different ARDS subtypes in adults with ARDS or severe pneumonia in the ICU.
-
Titrating PEEP in ARDS: Manual chest compression vs. electrical impedance tomography
In adults with ARDS on mechanical ventilation, the study tests whether a simple manual chest compression method can set the right PEEP as well as electrical impedance tomography (EIT).
-
Individualized PEEP Titration in ARDS Based on Lung Recruitment Potential
This pilot study tests two personalized PEEP strategies in adults with ARDS to see which approach better supports breathing mechanics by using a recruitment potential measure.
-
Single-dose inhaled rh-KGF-2 for ARDS in adults
This trial tests whether a single inhaled dose of rh-KGF-2 helps adults with ARDS who are on ventilators, using three dose levels to see which is safest and potentially most effective.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.