Comparing Interleukin 6 and Procalcitonin for Sepsis Detection in Burn Patients
Official title: Comparison Between Interleukin 6 and Procalcitonin in Detecting Sepsis and Incidence of Mortality in Burn ICU Patients
Run by Ain Shams University · NCT06915974 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether measuring Interleukin-6 can help doctors find sepsis in burn patients better than the usual test with procalcitonin.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 25 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 70 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ain Shams University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Cairo) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 10, 2025 |
| Main results expected | July 10, 2025 |
| Study ends | July 10, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | April 8, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06915974 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are patients with acute burns covering 25% to 50% of total body surface area, admitted to the burn ICU within 24 hours of injury.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with burns covering more than 50% or less than 25% of total body surface area, as well as those with autoimmune diseases or cancer, may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) compared to procalcitonin in identifying sepsis and septic shock in burn patients. Patients admitted to the burn ICU will have blood samples taken on days 1, 3, 7, and 10 to measure levels of IL-6 and procalcitonin. The results will guide clinical decisions regarding treatment success and the timing of ICU discharge. The study follows a structured treatment protocol based on the burn ICU standards.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved detection of sepsis in burn patients, potentially reducing mortality rates and ICU stay duration.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown varying success in using biomarkers like IL-6 for sepsis detection, but this specific comparison in burn patients is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with acute burn admitted to burn ICU within 24 hours from the burn incidence. * patients with burn percentage of 25% to 50% of total body surface area * patients with second to third degree burns * ASA 1 and ASA 2 patients Exclusion Criteria: * Burn percentage more than 50% or less than 25% of total body surface area * Having autoimmune diseases * Cancer patients * ASA 3 and ASA 4 patients
Where it's running
-
Ain Shams University
Cairo, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Ahmed H Elsayed, M.B.B.CH — Anaesthesia, intensive care, and pain management resident Ain Shams University
- Study coordinator: Ahmed H Elsayed, M.B.B.CH
- Email: AhmedHanyAbdelfatah@med.asu.edu.eg
- Phone: +201016305451
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Registry for monitoring CytoSorb device use in critically ill patients
This study is collecting information on how the CytoSorb device helps critically ill patients to improve care for conditions like septic shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome.
-
Early detection of sepsis-related blood clotting problems in severe burn patients
This study tests how well the JAAM-2 score can detect sepsis-induced coagulopathy early in adults with severe burns who develop sepsis in the ICU.
-
Non-invasive hemodynamic guidance for sepsis care on medical wards
This trial tests whether guiding fluid and vasopressor therapy for sepsis using non-invasive hemodynamic measurements works better than standard care.
-
Personalized Fluid Resuscitation in the Emergency Department
This pilot test checks if a quick, non-invasive stroke-volume assessment can help ED doctors tailor IV fluids for septic patients with low blood pressure.
-
Discordance between capillary refill time and oxygen use in septic shock
This study tests whether some septic shock patients can have a normal capillary refill time but still lack tissue oxygen use, to see if that mismatch relates to 28-day survival.
-
Targeting upper-normal magnesium to see if norepinephrine needs drop in septic shock
This trial tests whether keeping magnesium levels at the upper end of normal can reduce the amount and duration of norepinephrine needed in adults with septic shock.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.