Comparing immediate and delayed dental implant placement
Official title: Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Immediate or Late Implant Placement: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by University Ghent · NCT04741607 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether placing a dental implant right after a tooth is removed works better than waiting a bit, to see if it affects the need for extra treatment later on.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University Ghent Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 1, 2021 |
| Main results expected | January 1, 2028 |
| Study ends | January 1, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | February 2, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT04741607 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older with a single-rooted tooth in the anterior maxilla that requires extraction and sufficient bone for implant stability.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with systemic diseases, smoking habits, untreated periodontal disease, or untreated caries lesions may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This multicenter randomized controlled trial invites patients needing a single dental implant in the premaxilla to participate. Participants will undergo a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan to assess bone integrity before being randomly assigned to either immediate or delayed implant placement after tooth extraction. The study aims to evaluate the need for soft tissue augmentation at 5 months post-procedure by comparing outcomes between the two groups. A total of 60 patients will be treated across 6 centers, with a digital planning process and surgical guide utilized for precision.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide insights into optimal timing for dental implant placement, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing the need for additional procedures.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown varying success with immediate implant placement, but this specific approach comparing immediate versus delayed placement in this context is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * at least 18 years old * good oral hygiene defined as full-mouth plaque score ≤ 25% (O'Leary et al. 1972) * presence of a single-rooted tooth in the anterior maxilla (15-25) that needs to be extracted for any reason with at least one neighboring tooth present * at least 3 mm bone available at the apical or palatal aspect of the alveolus to ensure primary implant stability * intact or nearly intact buccal bone wall at the time of extraction (max 3 mm bone missing = max 6 mm distance from free gingival margin to buccal bone crest) Exclusion Criteria: * systemic diseases * smoking * untreated periodontal disease * untreated caries lesions
Where it's running
-
Ghent University
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium Recruiting -
UCL St Luc
Liège, Belgium Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Jan Cosyn, Professor
- Email: jan.cosyn@ugent.be
- Phone: +3293324000
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Analyzing outcomes of septorhinoplasty procedures
This study is trying to see how well septorhinoplasty surgery helps people breathe better and feel happier about their nose over the course of a year.
-
Post-operative Pain and Healing After Root Canal Re-Treatment Using Laser-Activated Irrigation vs Sonic or No Activation
This study tests whether laser-activated irrigation or sonic activation helps reduce post-operative pain and improve healing after re-treating a tooth with persistent apical inflammation, compared to conventional needle irrigation.
-
Can the Ronnie Gardiner Method improve thinking and daily function in people with Parkinson’s
In this 10-week program, adults with Parkinson’s disease will try the Ronnie Gardiner Method to see if it helps thinking, talking, movement, balance, and quality of life.
-
Perceptions of High and Low Intensity Speech Intervention in Children with a Cleft Palate
This study looks at how providers and children with cleft palate and their parents feel about high- versus low-intensity speech therapy to see which is more acceptable and helpful.
-
High- vs Low-Intensity Speech Therapy for Children with Phonological Speech Sounds
This study tests whether a higher-frequency speech therapy approach helps children aged 4–12 with phonological speech sound disorders more than a lower-frequency approach.
-
Muscle features linked to insulin resistance and cardiometabolic risk
This study tests whether specific muscle traits and activity patterns can help explain insulin resistance and related cardiometabolic risk in healthy adults.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.