Comparing High Flow Nasal Cannula and Non-Invasive Ventilation for COPD Exacerbations
Official title: High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non-Invasive Ventilation in Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
Run by Unity Health Toronto · NCT03033251 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether High Flow Nasal Cannula or Non-Invasive Ventilation works better to help people with COPD feel more comfortable and breathe easier during flare-ups.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 40 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 30 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Unity Health Toronto Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Toronto, Ontario) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 2, 2018 |
| Main results expected | April 11, 2025 |
| Study ends | July 1, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | May 20, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT03033251 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults over 40 years old with COPD exacerbation and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients requiring urgent intubation or those with severe respiratory acidosis may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) compared to Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) in patients experiencing exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive both treatments in a controlled setting, with each intervention lasting up to 30 minutes. The study aims to assess the physiological responses and tolerability of each method in a Medical-Surgical ICU environment. The primary focus is on improving patient comfort and respiratory function during acute episodes.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a more comfortable and effective method for managing acute respiratory distress in COPD patients.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown promising results with HFNC in similar patient populations, suggesting potential benefits over traditional NIV.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. COPD exacerbation and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with acute respiratory failure defined by * Respiratory acidosis (pH ≤7.35 and PaCO2 ≥45 mmHg); * Respiratory rate≥20 breaths/min; * Activation of accessory respiratory muscles; 2. Undergone at NIV or HFNC since their admission 3. English speaking 4. Adult patient with age \> 40 year old. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Severe respiratory acidosis defined by pH\<7.25 2. Decreased level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Score Scale \< 11) 3. Urgent intubation required 4. Pneumothorax with pleural drainage and persistent air leak 5. Hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressors 6. Uncooperative 7. Patients with skin or chest wall or abdominal trauma (potentially worsened by placement of a surface sensor) 8. Clinical judgement of the attending physician 9. Body mass index \> 40 kg/m2
Where it's running
-
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Laurent Brochard, MD
- Email: BrochardL@smh.ca
- Phone: +1 416 864 5686
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
High-flow nasal cannula versus home mechanical ventilation for COPD patients with persistent high carbon dioxide after an exacerbation
This study tests whether using high-flow nasal cannula plus standard oxygen can lower CO2 as well as home mechanical ventilation plus standard oxygen in people with COPD who still have high CO2 after a severe flare.
-
Using a closed-loop oxygen controller for high flow oxygen treatment in critically ill adults
This study is testing a new system that automatically adjusts oxygen levels for critically ill adults with breathing problems to see if it helps them breathe better than the usual method.
-
Monitoring end-tidal carbon dioxide levels in COPD exacerbations
This study is testing if measuring carbon dioxide levels in the breath can help doctors figure out how severe a COPD flare-up is for patients coming to the emergency room.
-
Using different masks to prevent pressure sores in patients with respiratory failure
This study tests if using different types of masks during breathing support can help prevent pressure sores in patients with severe breathing problems.
-
Identifying and treating sleep disorders in patients with acute respiratory failure
This study is trying to find out if sleep problems are common in people with severe breathing issues and how these problems affect their recovery and chances of going back to the hospital.
-
Effects of music therapy on ICU patients on mechanical ventilation
This study is testing if live music therapy can help ICU patients on mechanical ventilation breathe easier and recover faster.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.