Comparing Graston and Active Release Techniques for Low Back Pain in Women
Official title: Effects of Graston Versus Active Release Technique on Hamstring Flexibility, Pain and Disability in Females With Non Specific Low Back Pain
Run by Riphah International University · NCT06877767 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether the Graston Technique or Active Release Technique works better to relieve low back pain in women aged 25 to 50.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 25 Years to 50 Years |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Sialkot, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 2, 2025 |
| Main results expected | September 2, 2025 |
| Study ends | September 15, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | March 24, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06877767 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are females aged 25 to 50 with a history of non-specific low back pain lasting at least three months.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with acute pain, severe underlying conditions, or recent injuries may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of two soft tissue manipulation techniques, Graston Technique (GT) and Active Release Technique (ART), in treating non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) in females aged 25 to 50. The study will involve 40 participants who will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Both techniques are designed to alleviate pain and improve flexibility by targeting tight hamstring muscles, which are often associated with low back pain. The outcomes will be assessed using pain scales and disability indices to determine which method is more effective in reducing symptoms and improving mobility.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a more effective treatment option for women suffering from non-specific low back pain.
How similar studies have gone: While there have been studies on soft tissue techniques for low back pain, this specific comparison of Graston and Active Release Techniques is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Females with Non Specific Low Back Pain * Age group between 25 and 50 years * History of NSLBP for at least 3 months * Popliteal angle Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score of 3-7/10 * The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of 20-60 * Patients agree to sign written consent form. Exclusion Criteria: * Acute onset of pain and pain with radiation below knee. * Any history of injury in the lower extremity in the past three months. * Constant or persistent severe pain, inflammatory conditions (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis) * participants must not be taking any treatment of a musculoskeletal nature. * Any previous surgery around the knee and hip * hamstrings injury and strains * Pregnant females * Allergy to hot pack
Where it's running
-
Allama Iqbal Memorial Teaching Hospital
Sialkot, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Ghulam Fatima, PHD* — Riphah International University
- Study coordinator: Imran Amjad, PHD*
- Email: imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: 03324390125
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
A novel multi angular isometric lumbar exercise for chronic low back pain
This trial tests MAILE, a new lumbar exercise method, to see if it helps adults with nonspecific chronic low back pain more than standard lumbar stabilization and core exercises.
-
Pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, and activity in postmenopausal women with chronic low back pain
This observational study looks at how negative pain thoughts and fear of moving relate to how active postmenopausal women with long‑standing low back pain are.
-
Analgesia boost from adding a sacral submultifidus block to SIJ injection
This study tests whether adding a sacral submultifidus block to a standard image-guided sacroiliac joint injection provides better pain relief and function for adults with chronic SIJ‑related pain.
-
Telerehabilitation after spine surgery
This trial tests different ways of delivering post-operative instructions to people who had spinal decompression surgery to see how it affects recovery and healthcare use.
-
How patient education helps people with chronic musculoskeletal pain stick to home exercise for pain relief
A structured patient education program is tested to see if it helps people with chronic low back pain, knee osteoarthritis, and shoulder problems stick with their home exercise plan to relieve pain.
-
Core endurance vs segmental stabilization for low back pain in recreational athletes
This trial tests whether core endurance exercises or segmental stabilization exercises better help recreational athletes with non-specific low back pain.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.