Comparing EFTR versus STER for removing small gastric GISTs
Official title: Exposed Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection (EFTR) Versus Submucosal Tunnelling Endoscopic Resection (STER) for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) - an International Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by Chinese University of Hong Kong · NCT07411118 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) or submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) is better at completely removing small (1.0–3.5 cm) gastric GISTs in adults.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 136 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Chinese University of Hong Kong Academic / other |
| Locations | 4 sites (Shanghai and 3 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 1, 2032 |
| Study ends | February 1, 2033 |
| Registry record updated | February 13, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07411118 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–75 with a single gastric subepithelial tumor 1.0–3.5 cm arising from the muscularis propria, without high-risk features and deemed feasible for either EFTR or STER, are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with tumors unsuitable for endoscopic resection (unfavorable location, high-risk morphology), multiple tumors, or lesions outside the 1.0–3.5 cm range are unlikely to benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a multi-center, double-blinded randomized trial enrolling adults with 1.0–3.5 cm gastric GISTs judged suitable for endoscopic removal. Participants are randomly assigned to undergo EFTR or STER performed by expert endoscopists under general anesthesia using established techniques. Outcomes include complete margin-negative (R0) resection and adverse events, with follow-up to compare safety and efficacy between the two approaches. The trial is being run at high-volume centers in Hong Kong, mainland China, India, and Japan to standardize technique and capture international data.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the results could identify which endoscopic method more reliably removes small gastric GISTs with clear margins while keeping complication rates low, helping patients avoid more invasive surgery.
How similar studies have gone: Both EFTR and STER have been used successfully in observational series and case series with favorable short-term recovery, but a direct randomized head-to-head comparison like this is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Consecutive adult patients age \>=18 and \<=75 with a clinical diagnosis of gastric GIST who opted for endoscopic resection would be screened for eligibility. Inclusion Criteria: * Presence of gastric subepithelial tumor on diagnostic upper endoscopy, and * Diagnostic EUS and CT scan with intravenous contrast suspicious of GIST arising from muscularis propria layer, size with maximum diameter \>=1.0cm and \<= 3.5cm, and * Absence of high risk features, including irregular margins, invasion to surrounding organs, lesion hypervascularity, and * Endoscopic morphology and location deemed feasible with both EFTR and STER by an expert endoscopist, or * Histological confirmation of GIST through EUS guided fine needle biopsy (Optional, based on recommendation from guidelines) Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with tumors deemed not suitable for endoscopic resection (Either EFTR or STER), due to unfavourable location, high risk morphology, or any other reasons. * Patients with multiple tumors. * Patients unable or unwilling to provide consent. * Previous esophageal or gastric surgery. * Patients with significant cardiorespiratory comorbidities which may limit their ability to undertake general anesthesia for the procedure, including ASA grade III or above. * Pregnant women or those planning pregnancy or breastfeeding women. * Uncorrectable coagulopathy defined by international normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.5 or platelet count \< 50000/µl. * Patients on double anti-platelet agents or anti-coagulation (Warfarin, heparin or other direct oral anticoagulants)
Where it's running
-
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong Recruiting -
Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University
Shanghai, China Not yet recruiting -
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
Hyderabad, India Not yet recruiting -
Osaka International Cancer Institute
Osaka, Japan Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Hon Chi Yip — Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Study coordinator: Hon Chi Yip
- Email: hcyip@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
- Phone: +852 3505 2956
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
GIST Patient Registry for real-world insights
This registry collects medical information from people with GIST to see how the disease behaves in real life and to help improve care.
-
KQB198 plus imatinib for first-line advanced or metastatic GIST
This Phase 2 test will see if adding the experimental drug KQB198 to imatinib helps people with advanced or metastatic GIST who are starting first-line treatment.
-
Lenvatinib for advanced GIST after imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib
This trial tests whether the oral drug lenvatinib can help people with metastatic or advanced GIST whose disease has progressed on imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib.
-
Olverembatinib for treating SDH-deficient GIST
This study is testing if a new medication called olverembatinib can help people with a specific type of gastrointestinal tumor feel better after they’ve already tried one other treatment.
-
Lutetium Lu 177 Edotreotide dose-finding for children with SSTR-positive tumors
This test gives Lutetium Lu 177 Edotreotide to children ages 2 to under 18 with somatostatin receptor–positive tumors to find a safe pediatric dose and see how the drug behaves in the body.
-
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic procedures for upper gastrointestinal cancers
This study looks at how well certain endoscopic procedures work for treating larger upper gastrointestinal cancers and what the long-term results are for patients.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.