Comparing different techniques of male circumcision
Official title: Outcomes Of The Different Techniques Of Male Circumcision
Run by Sohag University · NCT06766838 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing different methods of male circumcision in boys under 15 to see which one is safest and works best.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | Any age to 5 Years |
| Sex | Men only |
| Enrollment | 100 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Sohag University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Sohag) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 1, 2024 |
| Main results expected | June 1, 2025 |
| Study ends | July 1, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | January 13, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06766838 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are uncircumcised boys under 15 years of age who require circumcision for routine or medical reasons.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients over 15 years of age or those with congenital penile anomalies or bleeding disorders may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, clinical outcomes, cosmetic appearance, and complication rates associated with various techniques of male circumcision. Infants will be divided into six groups based on the circumcision method used, including conventional dissection, bone cutting, electro-cauterization, thermal cauterization, Gomco clamp, and Plastibell device techniques. The study will be conducted at Sohag University Hospital over a six-month period, focusing on uncircumcised boys under 15 years of age. The goal is to provide comprehensive data on the outcomes of each technique.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could help identify the safest and most effective circumcision techniques for infants, leading to improved patient outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored various circumcision techniques, but this study aims to provide a comprehensive comparison, making it a valuable addition to existing literature.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. All uncircumcised boys with intact prepuce 2. Age below 5 years presented at our department for routine circumcision or for medical indications. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Age above 5 years 2. Ambiguous genitalia 3. Congenital penile anomalies 4. Redo-circumcision 5. Balanitis or inflammatory process around the penis. 6. Bleeding disorders
Where it's running
-
Sohag University
Sohag, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Mahmoud Bakr Ahmed
- Email: mbakr7725@gmail.com
- Phone: 021153259080
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Trauma registry at Sohag University Hospital
This study tests the creation of a trauma registry in the emergency department to collect data on injured adults admitted with polytrauma at Sohag University Hospital.
-
Prevalence of Myocardial Bridging and its relation to Coronary Plaques on MDCT
This study tests how common myocardial bridging is and whether it relates to coronary plaque in patients undergoing coronary CT angiography.
-
Septoplasty: see if it changes headache symptoms
This study tests whether septoplasty can change headache severity in adults with septal deviation and headache.
-
Predicting SLE Flares with Patient Reports and Machine Learning
Aims to test a low-cost, patient-reported outcome–based machine learning tool to see if it can detect lupus flares early and support care, especially in settings with limited resources.
-
Is geographic mismatch linked to short-term major heart problems after long drug-eluting stent placement?
This study checks whether geographic mismatch can predict short-term major adverse cardiovascular events after a long drug-eluting stent is placed in the coronary arteries.
-
Biomarkers to predict no-reflow after opening the heart’s artery in STEMI patients
This study tests whether immune-inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers can predict coronary no-reflow after primary PCI in adults with STEMI.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.