Comparing device removal with antibiotic treatment for possible heart device infections
Official title: Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device RemOval Versus Full CoUrse Medical Treatment - the CIEDOUT Study - a Randomized Clinical Trial
Run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet · NCT06323668 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether removing heart devices along with antibiotics can help people with suspected infections do better than just taking antibiotics alone.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 180 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Copenhagen) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 17, 2024 |
| Main results expected | June 2028 |
| Study ends | January 31, 2038 |
| Registry record updated | November 20, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT06323668 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include patients with bacteremia and possible CIED infection, particularly those with specific pathogens detected in blood cultures.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with definite CIED infections or those who are clinically frail may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The CIEDOUT study is an open-label randomized trial aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) removal combined with guideline antibiotic therapy versus a standard 6-week antibiotic therapy alone in patients with suspected CIED infections. The study focuses on patients with bacteremia and possible CIED infection, assessing whether the removal of the device can prevent death or relapse of bacteremia over a 6-month follow-up period. This is the first randomized clinical trial of its kind, addressing a significant gap in current treatment guidelines and practices for managing possible CIED infections.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved treatment protocols that significantly reduce mortality and relapse rates in patients with possible CIED infections.
How similar studies have gone: This study is novel and untested, as no previous randomized clinical trials have been conducted on this specific treatment approach for possible CIED infections.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Possible CIED infection\* AND Bacteremia/fungemia with S. aureus detected in ≥1 positive blood culture(s) or CoNS, Cutibacterium spp., Candida spp, Streptococcus spp. (except Streptococcus pneumoniae), and Enterococcus faecalis detected in ≥2 positive blood cultures. OR Left-sided valve infective endocarditis AND Possible CIED infection\* AND Bacteremia/fungemia detected in ≥1 positive blood culture(s) with S. aureus, CoNS, Cutibacterium spp., Candida spp., Streptococcus spp. (except Streptococcus pneumoniae), and Enterococcus faecalis Exclusion Criteria: * Unavailable for follow-up (e.g. tourist) * Unwilling to sign informed consent * Unable to sign informed consent OR At least one of the following criteria * Not a candidate by clinician discretion * Definite CIED infection\* * Clinical frailty score ≥7 * EUROSCORE II \>33% * Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) \<1L or \<30% of expected * By the modified Duke and ESC diagnostic criteria
Where it's running
-
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Emil L Fosbøl, MD, PhD — Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Study coordinator: Emil L Fosbøl, MD, PhD
- Email: emil.fosboel@regionh.dk
- Phone: +4535456340
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing lifelong antibiotic therapy to stopping antibiotics for CIED infections
This study is testing if a 6-week course of antibiotics can help people with heart device infections who can’t have their device removed, and it will compare their results to those who stop taking antibiotics.
-
Oral switch for bloodstream infections in immunocompromised children
This trial tests whether switching from IV to oral antibiotics is just as safe as continuing IV therapy for children with bloodstream infections who are immunocompromised or have a central venous catheter.
-
Proton Therapy for Mediastinal Lymphoma in Denmark
This study tests whether using proton therapy for mediastinal lymphoma can lower late-toxicity risk compared with photon therapy in adults.
-
Oral switch for kids with bloodstream infections after starting IV therapy
This trial will test whether switching from IV to oral antibiotics early is not worse than continuing IV treatment for previously healthy children and teens with uncomplicated bloodstream infections.
-
Unilateral vs bilateral lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema
This trial tests whether operating on one lung or both lungs provides better breathing and quality of life for adults with severe emphysema due to COPD.
-
Scar remodeling after burn injury using stem cells from fat tissue
This trial tests whether injecting allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells into burn scars can improve scar quality for adults with hypertrophic scars.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.