Comparing bladder-sparing therapy versus bladder removal for recurrent high-grade NMIBC
Official title: Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options for Bladder Cancer 2
Run by University of Washington · NCT07225127 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This project will test whether bladder-sparing treatments or bladder removal work better for adults with recurrent high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer by looking at costs, health outcomes, and patient and caregiver experiences.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 408 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Washington Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 6 sites (Tampa, Florida and 5 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 3, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 2027 |
| Study ends | December 2028 |
| Registry record updated | October 21, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07225127 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18 or older with recurrent high-grade NMIBC (Tis, Ta, or T1) confirmed by pathology who have had at least one intravesical or systemic therapy in the past 12 months are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with prior cystectomy or pelvic radiation, a history of muscle-invasive or metastatic bladder cancer, non-urothelial histologies like plasmacytoid or small cell, or untreated urothelial cancer outside the bladder are not eligible and unlikely to benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
CISTO2 is a large prospective, observational, multicenter comparison of bladder-sparing intravesical therapies versus bladder removal in adults with recurrent high-grade non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The study will enroll patients with pathology-confirmed Tis, Ta, or T1 disease who have received at least one intravesical or systemic therapy in the prior 12 months and will exclude those with prior cystectomy, radiation, muscle-invasive or metastatic disease, or non-urothelial histologies such as plasmacytoid or small cell. Investigators will collect standardized patient-reported outcomes, financial toxicity measures, and clinical endpoints over time to compare quality of life, caregiver experience, and cancer outcomes between treatment approaches. The multicenter design, led by the University of Washington with participating sites at H. Lee Moffitt, University of Iowa, and UNC and with NCI collaboration, aims to produce real-world evidence to guide personalized treatment decisions.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the study could help patients and clinicians choose the treatment option that best balances cancer control, quality of life, and financial burden.
How similar studies have gone: Some prior series and comparative studies have looked at bladder-sparing approaches versus cystectomy, but randomized data are limited and results are mixed, so a large prospective comparison remains relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult 18 years of age or older; and 2. Presenting with high-grade NMIBC established by anatomic pathology as tumor stage classification Tis, Ta, or T1, and with: 1. Pathology documentation from any hospital/clinic/medical center 2. More than 50% urothelial carcinoma component in the specimen; and 3. History of high-grade NMIBC established by anatomic pathology as tumor stage classification Tis, Ta, or T1; and 4. In the previous 12 months, received at least one instillation of any intravesical agent (induction or maintenance) or one administration of systemic therapy for NMIBC treatment. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Any plasmacytoid or small cell (neuroendocrine) component in the pathology (past or current presentation); 2. Previous history of cystectomy or radiation therapy for bladder cancer; 3. Previous history of muscle-invasive bladder cancer or metastatic bladder cancer; 4. Untreated or current urinary tract urothelial carcinoma outside of the bladder (e.g. ureters, renal pelvis, penile urethra for males, urethra for females). Urinary tract cancer outside of the bladder treated more than 2 years ago is not an exclusion; 5. Incarcerated in a detention facility or in police custody at baseline/screening (patients wearing a monitoring device can be enrolled); 6. Contraindication to radical cystectomy (e.g., ASA of 4, patient not considered a radical cystectomy candidate due to comorbidity); 7. Contraindication to BST (i.e., intolerant of all intravesical and intravenous medical therapies); 8. Unable to provide written informed consent in English; 9. Unable to be contacted for research surveys; 10. Planning to participate in a blinded interventional clinical trial for NMIBC such that details about treatment or therapy received will be unavailable for data collection.
Where it's running
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, United States Recruiting -
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States Recruiting -
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States Recruiting -
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States Recruiting -
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States Recruiting -
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: John L Gore, MD, MS — Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
- Study coordinator: Sung Min Kim
- Email: cistorc@uw.edu
- Phone: 206-210-4040
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Active surveillance versus single-dose intravesical chemo after TURBT in low-shedding intermediate-risk NMIBC
This study tests whether some patients with intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer can skip additional bladder chemotherapy after complete tumor removal if urine tests show a low-shedding profile.
-
Sexual health support after bladder cancer treatment
This project will try sexological support to help adults about 12 months after bladder cancer treatment improve sexual function and intimacy.
-
Intravesical gemcitabine followed by docetaxel for high-grade BCG-unresponsive NMIBC
This trial tests whether putting gemcitabine then docetaxel directly into the bladder can treat adults with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer that did not respond to BCG.
-
Bladder cancer: test a biomarker-guided plan after neoadjuvant therapy
This phase 2 study tests a biomarker- and response-guided plan to preserve the bladder in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.
-
Urinary Cell-Free DNA Test for Urothelial Cancer Origin
This study tests a urine-based cell-free DNA test to help diagnose urothelial cancer and identify whether it started in the bladder or upper urinary tract in adults.
-
BL-M07D1: T-bren vs standard platinum chemo for HER2-expressing metastatic urothelial cancer after anti-PD-(L)1 therapy
This trial tests whether T-bren can help people with HER2-expressing metastatic urothelial cancer who progressed after anti-PD-(L)1 therapy, compared with standard platinum-based chemotherapy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.