Combining two antibiotics to treat Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
Official title: Combination Cefazolin With Ertapenem for Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia (CERT)
Run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre · NCT04886284 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing if using two antibiotics together can help adults with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia get better faster than the usual treatment.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 2 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years to 100 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Academic / other |
| Locations | 8 sites (Calgary, Alberta and 7 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 20, 2024 |
| Main results expected | April 2027 |
| Study ends | July 2027 |
| Registry record updated | November 2, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT04886284 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older with recent methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteremia.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who have already shown clinical improvement or have a known MRSA infection may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial investigates the effectiveness of combining cefazolin with ertapenem for treating methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. The study aims to determine if this combination can reduce the duration of bacteremia and improve patient outcomes compared to standard treatment. Participants must be adults diagnosed with S. aureus bacteremia within the last 48 hours and currently receiving cefazolin. The trial is part of a larger adaptive platform study focused on improving treatment for S. aureus infections.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could significantly reduce mortality rates associated with S. aureus bacteremia.
How similar studies have gone: While there is no prior randomized controlled trial for this specific combination, existing observational data suggests potential benefits, indicating this approach is promising yet novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
The participant must fulfil all inclusion and exclusion criteria for the SNAP Platform (NCT05137119) and also the following inclusion and exclusion criteria to be eligible for this sub-study: Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult \>=18 years old 2. S. aureus bacteremia within the past 48 hours: * with any unknown MRSA status (in centers with \<15% prevalence of MRSA in their annual blood cultures) or known negative MRSA screening swab within 90 days OR * which has already been shown to be MSSA 3. Current receipt of cefazolin or where it would be clinically appropriate (according to treating ID specialist) to switch to cefazolin as the backbone therapy (open label, non-study drug). NOTE: Up to an additional 12-24 hours of open label non-study VANCOMYCIN, LINEZOLID or DAPTOMYCIN may be allowed if there is sepsis and clinical concern for MRSA has not been excluded. Exclusion Criteria: Clinical: 1. At time of recruitment, the patient has already clinically improved with at least one subsequent negative culture at \>24 hours incubation 2. Anaphylaxis to any beta-lactam antibiotic (and any allergy to ertapenem) Polymicrobial bacteremia (not including skin commensals) 3. Known seizure disorder 4. Any receipt of valproic acid 5. Expected mortality within 48 hours 6. Need for critical care resources but "do not resuscitate" status precludes the receipt of critical care 7. Unable to provide informed consent and no available healthcare proxy (with ethics approval for deferred consent in cases of severe illness) Administrative: 1. Refusal to provide informed consent 2. Refusal of healthcare team to participate 3. No reliable means of outpatient contact (telephone/email/text) 4. Previously enrolled 5. Patients whose isolate is identified as MRSA post-enrollment will be subsequently excluded (see below). Note that because MSSA is much more common than MRSA in Canada (90% of all S. aureus bacteremia at MUHC, for example, are MSSA and in the presence of a negative MRSA screening swab or unknown MRSA status, this means that the risk of MRSA is less than 5%). We believe time to combination therapy is likely linked to benefit, therefore we will recruit the patients as soon as S. aureus is identified but potentially prior to confirmation the organism is MSSA. Where possible, rapid MRSA detection techniques will be deployed; however with conventional screening this will mean approximately a 12-24 hours delay. Organisms subsequently identified as MRSA will be excluded from the intention to treat analysis and the sample size will be adjusted accordingly to ensure the total enrollment meets study goals.
Where it's running
-
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada Recruiting -
Surrey Memorial Hospital
Surrey, British Columbia, Canada Recruiting -
Hamilton Health Sciences (Hamilton General Hospital and Juravinski Hospital)
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Recruiting -
The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Recruiting -
Niagara Health - St. Catharines site
Saint Catharines, Ontario, Canada Recruiting -
Hospital de la Cité de la Sante
Laval, Quebec, Canada Recruiting
Show 2 more locations
-
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada Recruiting -
McGill University Health Centre (Royal Victoria Hospital and Montreal General Hospital)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Todd C Lee, MD MPH FIDSA — Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Study coordinator: Lina Petrella
- Email: lina.petrella@muhc.mcgill.ca
- Phone: 514-934-1934
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Switching to dabigatran versus staying on apixaban/edoxaban/rivaroxaban for S. aureus bloodstream infection
This trial will try whether switching people with S. aureus bloodstream infection who are already taking apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban to dabigatran leads to better outcomes.
-
Comparing Daptomycin and Vancomycin for MRSA Bloodstream Infections
This study is testing whether daptomycin or vancomycin works better for treating bloodstream infections caused by MRSA in patients.
-
Clopidogrel versus aspirin to lower cardiovascular and infection complications in people with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection
This will try switching people with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection who are already taking aspirin for heart protection to clopidogrel to see if it improves infection outcomes.
-
Combination Antibiotics for Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in adults
This study tests whether using two antibiotics together for adults with Staphylococcus aureus in the blood works better than a single antibiotic.
-
Evaluating treatments for Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections
This study is testing different treatments for people with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections to find out which ones work best to help them recover and live longer.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.